CVE-2026-25243
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedRedis is an in-memory data structure store. In versions of redis-server up to 8.6.3, the RESTORE command does not properly validate serialized values. An authenticated attacker with permission to execute RESTORE can supply a crafted serialized payload that triggers invalid memory access and may lead to remote code execution. A workaround is to restrict access to the RESTORE command with ACL rules. This is patched in version 8.6.3.
In the news
Third-party coverage- Kimi K3 Agents Found Redis Zero-Days and Built RCE Exploit ...
- Weekly Recap: Instagram Account Hacks, Android Zero-Day, GitHub ...
Surfaced from public web coverage — external links open in a new tab.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe RESTORE command in Redis versions up to 8.6.3 fails to properly validate serialized values during deserialization. An authenticated attacker with RESTORE command permissions can supply a crafted serialized payload that triggers invalid memory access, potentially enabling remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 8.6.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Redis versionRun `redis-cli INFO server` or `redis-cli INFO | grep redis_version` to retrieve the server versionAffected if The version shown is less than 8.6.3 (for example, 8.6.2, 8.5.x, or earlier)
-
Verify RESTORE command is availableRun `redis-cli COMMAND INFO RESTORE` to confirm the command exists in the deploymentAffected if The command returns information indicating RESTORE is loaded and accessible
-
Identify users or clients with RESTORE permissionRun `redis-cli ACL LIST` to list all ACL users and their permissions, then search for users that include the `restore` or `+@restore` permissionAffected if Any ACL user account has RESTORE command permissions granted (either explicitly or via a category that includes it)
-
Confirm external access or untrusted user contextReview ACL rules or application configuration to determine if RESTORE-capable accounts are accessible to authenticated but untrusted users or external clientsAffected if The RESTORE permission is granted to users who are not fully trusted or who authenticate from untrusted network contexts
You are affected if your Redis version is below 8.6.3 AND any authenticated user or application account has RESTORE command permissions that could be exploited by an attacker.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.6.3
Upgrade Redis server to version 8.6.3 or later, or immediately restrict access to the RESTORE command using ACL rules as a compensating control until patching is feasible.
8.6.3
- 1. Backup your Redis data and configuration files before upgrading.
- 2. Check your current Redis version using: `redis-server --version`
- 3. Upgrade Redis to version 8.6.3 or later. For example, using your package manager or compiling from source.
- 4. Verify the upgrade was successful by running: `redis-server --version`
- 5. Restart the Redis service to apply the new version.
- 6. (Optional security hardening) Add an ACL rule to restrict RESTORE command access for additional defense-in-depth, e.g., `ACL SETUSER readonlyuser -@all +@read +@write -restore`
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-25243 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- github.com
- github.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- security.access.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-25243 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data