Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2026-25365

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-03-25
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Özgür KARALAR Kargo Takip kargo-takip-turkiye allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Kargo Takip: from n/a through < 0.2.4.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is a missing authorization vulnerability in the Kargo Takip application where the access control security levels are incorrectly configured. An attacker can exploit this to access resources or functionality they should not have permission to access, potentially exposing sensitive shipping or customer data.

MitigationImplement proper authorization checks on all sensitive endpoints and resources, ensuring that the application's access control security levels are correctly configured according to the principle of least privilege.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify sensitive endpoints in the application
    Review all application routes, API endpoints, and functional modules that handle shipping data, customer records, or administrative functions. Document which endpoints should require authentication and authorization.
    Affected if The application has endpoints that handle sensitive data but no clear authorization controls are defined.
  2. Test access controls with different user roles
    Create or use test accounts with different privilege levels (e.g., regular user, manager, admin). Attempt to access resources and functionality outside the intended permission scope for each role.
    Affected if A user with lower privileges can access resources or functions assigned to higher-privilege roles.
  3. Verify authorization middleware is present on sensitive routes
    Examine the application's source code or configuration to confirm that authorization checks are implemented on all sensitive endpoints. Look for authorization decorators, middleware, or access control logic.
    Affected if Sensitive endpoints lack authorization validation code or middleware.
  4. Review access control security level configuration
    Inspect the application's access control configuration settings, role definitions, and permission mappings. Verify that security levels are properly defined and enforced.
    Affected if Access control security levels are misconfigured, overly permissive, or not properly mapped to user roles.
  5. Check for insecure direct object references (IDOR)
    Test whether parameter manipulation or direct object references allow unauthorized access to shipping records, customer data, or other resources by modifying request parameters.
    Affected if Users can access other users' data by manipulating identifiers in requests.

The environment is affected if the Kargo Takip application lacks proper authorization checks on sensitive endpoints, has misconfigured access control security levels, or allows privilege escalation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper authorization checks on all sensitive endpoints and resources, ensuring that the application's access control security levels are correctly configured according to the principle of least privilege.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

0.2.4 or later

  1. 1. Backup your WordPress site before making any changes
  2. 2. Navigate to the WordPress admin dashboard
  3. 3. Go to Plugins > Installed Plugins
  4. 4. Find the 'Kargo Takip' plugin
  5. 5. Check the current version - if it is below 0.2.4, update is needed
  6. 6. Update the plugin to version 0.2.4 or latest available version
  7. 7. Verify the update was successful by checking the plugin version

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-25365 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-25365 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data