CVE-2026-25429
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDeserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in wpdive Nexa Blocks nexa-blocks allows Object Injection.This issue affects Nexa Blocks: from n/a through <= 1.1.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability in the Nexa Blocks WordPress plugin allows remote attackers to inject malicious PHP objects, potentially leading to remote code execution via PHP object injection.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Nexa Blocks plugin is installedCheck the WordPress plugins directory (wp-content/plugins/) for the nexa-blocks folder, or query the wp_options table for 'active_plugins' to see if Nexa Blocks is enabled.Affected if The plugin folder exists and the plugin is active in WordPress.
-
Identify installed Nexa Blocks versionOpen the main plugin file (usually nexa-blocks.php) in the plugin directory and locate the 'Version' header comment, or check the WordPress plugin admin page for the installed version number.Affected if The version number is 1.1.1 or lower.
-
Review plugin data handling endpointsExamine plugin PHP files for calls to unserialize() function, particularly any that process data from user requests (GET, POST, COOKIE, or REST API parameters).Affected if The plugin contains unserialize() calls that process untrusted input without prior validation.
-
Inspect server access logs for exploitation signaturesSearch HTTP logs for requests to the Nexa Blocks plugin paths containing serialized PHP objects (look for patterns like 'O:', 'a:', or base64-encoded serialized payloads).Affected if Suspicious requests with serialized data are found targeting the plugin.
Your environment is affected if the Nexa Blocks plugin is installed, active, and running version 1.1.1 or lower, with the deserialization functionality accessible to unauthenticated users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate Nexa Blocks to the latest patched version immediately; if no patched version is available, disable the plugin and deploy a WAF rule to block deserialization attacks.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-25429 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-25429 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data