CVE-2026-25437
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in سید محمدامین هاشمی GZSEO gzseo allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects GZSEO: from n/a through <= 2.0.14.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMissing Authorization vulnerability in GZSEO plugin versions through 2.0.14 allows attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels, likely enabling unauthorized access to certain functionality or data that should require authentication or higher privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify GZSEO plugin versionLocate the GZSEO plugin in your CMS/plugin directory and read the version metadata from the main plugin file or version manifestAffected if The installed version is 2.0.14 or any earlier version of GZSEO (versions through 2.0.14)
-
Review access control configurationInspect the plugin settings for any security level, permission, or access control configuration options and verify which user roles are permitted to access plugin functionsAffected if The plugin exposes functionality to unauthenticated or lower-privileged users due to missing authorization checks
-
Test sensitive endpointsAttempt to access plugin admin pages, AJAX endpoints, or API functions without authentication or while logged in as a low-privilege userAffected if Access is granted without proper authorization validation
-
Audit role-based access settingsCheck the CMS user role configuration and compare which roles can access GZSEO plugin features versus what those roles should legitimately have access toAffected if Users with insufficient privileges can access plugin administrative or sensitive functions
You are affected if GZSEO plugin version is 2.0.14 or earlier and the plugin exposes any functionality to users who should not have access based on your access control requirements.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate GZSEO to the latest patched version when available; alternatively, implement additional access control checks at the application or server level and audit all endpoints for proper authorization enforcement.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-25437 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-25437 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data