CVE-2026-25441
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in varunvairavanlc LeadConnector leadconnector allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects LeadConnector: from n/a through <= 3.0.21.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a Missing Authorization (Broken Access Control) vulnerability in LeadConnector where the application fails to properly enforce authorization checks, allowing attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels. Users may be able to access functionality or data beyond their intended permissions without proper authentication validation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm LeadConnector installationIdentify if LeadConnector (or related GoHighLevel products) is deployed in your environment by checking installed applications, container images, or service inventories.Affected if LeadConnector is present in the environment and uses access control mechanisms.
-
Locate version informationCheck for version markers in application metadata, container labels, package manifests, or admin dashboard 'About' sections if accessible.Affected if The installed version cannot be determined or falls within an affected release range.
-
Review access control configurationExamine role-based access control (RBAC) settings, user permission matrices, and security level configurations within the LeadConnector admin interface or configuration files.Affected if RBAC is not properly configured, roles have overly broad permissions, or security levels are set too permissively.
-
Test authorization enforcement on sensitive endpointsUsing an authenticated session with limited privileges, attempt to access or modify resources, data, or administrative functions outside the intended scope to verify if authorization is enforced.Affected if Lower-privileged users can access or perform actions reserved for higher-privileged roles or other users.
You are affected if LeadConnector is deployed and users with limited permissions can access functionality or data beyond their intended authorization level without proper validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authorization checks on all sensitive endpoints and enforce role-based access control (RBAC) to verify user permissions before granting access to resources or actions. Upgrade to the latest version of LeadConnector if a patched version is available.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-25441 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-25441 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data