CVE-2026-2553
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security flaw has been discovered in tushar-2223 Hotel-Management-System up to bb1f3b3666124b888f1e4bcf51b6fba9fbb01d15. This affects an unknown part of the file /home.php of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument Name/Email results in sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. Continious delivery with rolling releases is used by this product. Therefore, no version details of affected nor updated releases are available. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the Hotel-Management-System's /home.php file allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries via the Name/Email POST parameter. The vulnerability exists in the HTTP POST Request Handler component and has a public exploit available.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Hotel-Management-System installationLocate the web application's document root and confirm the presence of Hotel-Management-System files, particularly /home.phpAffected if The application is running and /home.php exists in the web directory
-
Check for vulnerable /home.php fileInspect the /home.php file for POST parameter handling code, specifically looking for Name and Email parameters being used in SQL queries without prepared statementsAffected if The file contains direct SQL query construction using $_POST['Name'] or $_POST['Email'] without parameter binding
-
Verify POST request handler vulnerabilityReview the HTTP POST Request Handler code in /home.php to confirm if user-supplied Name/Email input is concatenated directly into SQL statementsAffected if The code shows SQL queries where POST parameters are inserted directly into query strings rather than bound as parameters
-
Test parameter injection possibilityIf accessible, send a crafted POST request to /home.php with SQL injection payloads in the Name or Email fields and observe database response behaviorAffected if The application returns database errors or exhibits unexpected behavior indicating SQL injection is possible
A defender is affected if they run the Hotel-Management-System with the /home.php file containing direct SQL query construction using Name/Email POST parameters without prepared statements.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database operations using the Name/Email parameters. Apply input validation and consider deploying a WAF as an interim control given the vendor's non-response.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-2553 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-2553 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data