Ng FirewallApplication · Arista

CVE-2026-25622

MEDIUM · 6.0 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-05
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 17.4.1 or later.
See remediation →
66/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A Captive Portal Custom Handler command injection vulnerability exists in Arista Edge Threat Management - Arista Next Generation Firewall (NGFW). On affected platforms, an administrative account logged into the user interface can exploit this input handling behavior to execute arbitrary platform shell commands.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A command injection vulnerability exists in the Captive Portal Custom Handler of Arista Edge Threat Management/NGFW. An authenticated administrative user with UI access can exploit improper input handling to execute arbitrary shell commands on the underlying platform.

MitigationRestrict administrative access to trusted users, implement strict input validation/sanitization on captive portal custom handler inputs, and apply vendor patches when available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Ng FirewallApplication
Affected:< 17.4.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Arista Ng Firewall version
    Access the administrative UI or use CLI to retrieve the system version. In the CLI, this is typically shown via 'show version' or accessible through the web interface under System > Status or About sections.
    Affected if The installed version is lower than 17.4.1
  2. Confirm Captive Portal feature is enabled
    Navigate to the web administrative UI and locate the Captive Portal settings, typically under Network > Captive Portal or Users > Captive Portal. Check if the feature is toggled to enabled.
    Affected if Captive Portal is enabled in the configuration
  3. Verify Custom Handler is configured
    Within the Captive Portal configuration panel, locate the Custom Handler field or section. Inspect whether any custom handler scripts or commands are defined.
    Affected if A Custom Handler is defined with custom command strings
  4. Inspect Custom Handler for injection vectors
    Review the Custom Handler configuration for unsanitized input patterns, particularly looking for shell metacharacters (; | & $ ` or command substitution patterns) within command fields.
    Affected if The Custom Handler contains shell metacharacters or appears to concatenate user-supplied input into shell commands

You are affected if your Arista Ng Firewall version is below 17.4.1 AND the Captive Portal Custom Handler feature is enabled with a configured custom command that could accept or concatenate user input.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 17.4.1 or later
Fixed in 17.4.1
Interim mitigation

Restrict administrative access to trusted users, implement strict input validation/sanitization on captive portal custom handler inputs, and apply vendor patches when available.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Ng Firewall 17.4.1

  1. Identify the current Arista Ng Firewall version in use
  2. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade process
  3. Back up the current configuration following standard backup procedures
  4. Upgrade to Ng Firewall version 17.4.1 or later
  5. Verify the upgrade completed successfully
  6. Confirm the Captive Portal Custom Handler functionality is working as expected
  7. Validate the configuration was preserved after upgrade

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Ng Firewall Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-25622 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-25622 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data