CVE-2026-25761
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSuper-linter is a combination of multiple linters to run as a GitHub Action or standalone. From 6.0.0 to 8.3.0, the Super-linter GitHub Action is vulnerable to command injection via crafted filenames. When this action is used in downstream GitHub Actions workflows, an attacker can submit a pull request that introduces a file whose name contains shell command substitution syntax, such as $(...). In affected Super-linter versions, runtime scripts may execute the embedded command during file discovery processing, enabling arbitrary command execution in the workflow runner context. This can be used to disclose the job’s GITHUB_TOKEN depending on how the workflow configures permissions. This vulnerability is fixed in 8.3.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSuper-linter GitHub Action versions 6.0.0 through 8.3.0 are vulnerable to command injection via malicious filenames containing shell command substitution syntax like $(...). During file discovery processing, the embedded commands execute in the workflow runner context, potentially exposing the GITHUB_TOKEN.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.0.0, < 8.3.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate Super-linter workflow referencesSearch your repository for .yml or .yaml files in .github/workflows/ that contain 'super-linter' or 'super-linter' in the 'uses' field of a GitHub Action stepAffected if Files exist that reference super-linter in a workflow
-
Extract the Super-linter versionIn each workflow file, look for the 'uses' statement (e.g., 'github/[email protected]' or 'github/[email protected]') and record the version number or tag after the '@' symbolAffected if A version number or tag is present in the workflow
-
Compare against vulnerable version rangeCheck if the extracted version is >= 6.0.0 AND < 8.3.1. If using a floating tag like 'v6' or 'latest', resolve it to a concrete version by inspecting the GitHub Actions marketplace or repository releasesAffected if The version is 6.0.0, 6.1.0, 6.2.0, ..., 7.x.x, 8.0.0, 8.1.0, 8.2.0, or 8.3.0
-
Identify all workflows using vulnerable versionsReview all workflow files under .github/workflows/ recursively to ensure no instance of Super-linter version 6.0.0-8.3.0 is in use across the entire repositoryAffected if Any workflow file references a version in the vulnerable range
You are affected if any GitHub Actions workflow in your repository uses Super-linter version 6.0.0 through 8.3.0 (including any 8.3.0.x patch version below 8.3.1).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.3.1
Upgrade Super-linter to version 8.3.1 or later in all GitHub Actions workflow files that reference it.
8.3.1
- Locate the GitHub Actions workflow file that uses Super Linter (typically in .github/workflows/ or similar)
- Find the version reference for the super-linter action (e.g., uses: github/[email protected] or uses: github/super-linter@v6)
- Update the version to 8.3.1 or later (e.g., change @v6 to @v8.3.1 or @v8)
- Commit and push the changes to trigger the workflow with the updated version
- Verify the workflow runs successfully with the new version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-25761 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-25761 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data