Cross-site Scripting (XSS)Weakness · CWE-79

CVE-2026-25789

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-12
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
75/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Affected devices do not properly validate and sanitize filenames on the Firmware Update page. This could allow a remote attacker to social engineer the user into selecting the modified firmware file to be uploaded. This would result in malitcious JavaScript execution in the context of the authenticated user's session without requiring the file to be uploaded, potentially leading to session hijacking or credential theft.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is a stored XSS vulnerability on the Firmware Update page where the device fails to validate and sanitize filenames. An attacker social engineers a user into selecting a maliciously-named firmware file, causing JavaScript to execute in the authenticated user's browser context upon file selection (before actual upload), enabling session hijacking or credential theft.

MitigationImplement strict filename validation and sanitization on the firmware upload page, including allowlist filtering and HTML encoding of displayed filenames. Additionally, implement Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to mitigate XSS execution.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate the firmware update interface
    Navigate to the device's administrative web interface and search for sections labeled 'Firmware', 'Update', 'Upgrade', or 'System Maintenance'. Identify if a firmware upload or file selection input exists.
    Affected if The device provides a web-based firmware update feature with a file selection input.
  2. Inspect the file input HTML source
    Right-click the firmware upload page and view the page source (or use browser developer tools). Examine the <input type='file'> element and surrounding markup for any client-side filename validation or encoding.
    Affected if The HTML displays or reflects the selected filename without HTML entity encoding (e.g., shows raw filename in an element that updates on file selection).
  3. Test filename reflection in the browser
    On the firmware update page, click 'Choose File' and observe how the selected filename is displayed in the UI. Check if special characters like <, >, ', or " in a test filename appear rendered as-is or as HTML entities.
    Affected if The filename appears as plain text with potentially executable characters (such as <script> tags) visible or the UI updates to show the raw filename without sanitization.
  4. Check for Content Security Policy headers
    Use browser developer tools (Network tab) to inspect HTTP response headers from the firmware update page. Look for a 'Content-Security-Policy' header and examine its directives, particularly 'script-src' and 'unsafe-inline'.
    Affected if No CSP header is present, or CSP allows 'unsafe-inline' without other mitigations, leaving the page vulnerable to XSS execution.

A user is affected if their device firmware update page displays or reflects the selected filename in the browser without HTML encoding and lacks a restrictive Content Security Policy, allowing injected script tags in a maliciously-named firmware file to execute upon file selection.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict filename validation and sanitization on the firmware upload page, including allowlist filtering and HTML encoding of displayed filenames. Additionally, implement Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to mitigate XSS execution.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,130
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-25789 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-25789 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data