CVE-2026-25869
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMiniGal Nano versions 0.3.5 and prior contain a path traversal vulnerability in index.php via the dir parameter. The application appends user-controlled input to the photos directory and attempts to prevent traversal by removing dot-dot sequences, but this protection can be bypassed using crafted directory patterns. An attacker can exploit this behavior to cause the application to enumerate and display image files from unintended filesystem locations that are readable by the web server, resulting in unintended information disclosure.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMiniGal Nano 0.3.5 and prior contains a path traversal vulnerability in index.php via the 'dir' parameter. The application appends user-controlled input to the photos directory and attempts to block traversal by removing dot-dot (..) sequences, but this protection can be bypassed using crafted directory patterns, allowing attackers to read image files from arbitrary filesystem locations accessible to the web server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 0.3.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm MiniGal Nano installationSearch the web server document root for the presence of 'index.php' and look for Minigal Nano files (templates, config, etc.)Affected if MiniGal Nano files are present on the server
-
Identify installed versionOpen index.php and look for a version variable or string (often near the top in comments or a defined constant). Compare against 0.3.5.Affected if The version string shows 0.3.5 or any version prior to it
-
Verify index.php handles the dir parameterInspect index.php source code and locate where the 'dir' parameter is processed (search for $_GET['dir'] or similar). Confirm it performs string concatenation to build a path.Affected if The code shows $_GET['dir'] being used to construct file paths without proper validation
-
Confirm blacklist-based sanitization existsSearch the index.php code for string manipulation that strips '..' sequences (look for str_replace, preg_replace targeting dot-dot patterns)Affected if The code uses str_replace or similar to remove '..' as a blacklist filter instead of realpath() validation
-
Check application accessibilityDetermine if the web server serves the MiniGal Nano directory publicly and the index.php is reachable via HTTPAffected if The vulnerable index.php is accessible over the network and accepts user input
The environment is affected if MiniGal Nano version 0.3.5 or prior is installed and accessible, with index.php processing the 'dir' parameter using blacklist-based traversal sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement strict input validation on the 'dir' parameter using realpath() to canonicalize paths and verify the resolved path stays within the intended photos directory, or employ a whitelist approach for allowed directories.
latest stable release (check SourceForge for version newer than 0.3.5)
- 1. Backup the current Minigal Nano installation and its configuration files
- 2. Download the latest version of Minigal Nano from the official SourceForge repository
- 3. Replace all files in the existing installation with the files from the new version, preserving local configuration if applicable
- 4. Verify the new version by checking the version number displayed in the gallery footer
- 5. Test that the dir parameter now properly restricts access to the designated photos directory only
- 6. Confirm that path traversal attempts using dot-dot sequences are blocked or handled safely in the updated version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-25869 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-25869 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data