CVE-2026-25874
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedLeRobot through 0.5.1 contains an unsafe deserialization vulnerability in the async inference pipeline where pickle.loads() is used to deserialize data received over unauthenticated gRPC channels without TLS in the policy server and robot client components. An unauthenticated network-reachable attacker can achieve arbitrary code execution on the server or client by sending a crafted pickle payload through the SendPolicyInstructions, SendObservations, or GetActions gRPC calls.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceLeRobot through 0.5.1 uses pickle.loads() to deserialize data from unauthenticated gRPC connections without TLS encryption. An attacker can send malicious pickle payloads via SendPolicyInstructions, SendObservations, or GetActions gRPC calls to achieve arbitrary code execution on affected policy servers or robot clients.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 0.5.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check LeRobot versionRun 'pip show lerobot' or 'pip list | grep lerobot' to identify the installed version. Compare it to the affected range: versions 0.5.1 and below.Affected if The installed version is 0.5.1 or lower.
-
Identify gRPC usage in deploymentSearch codebase or running services for imports of 'grpc' or usage of SendPolicyInstructions, SendObservations, or GetActions gRPC methods.Affected if The application uses these specific gRPC methods for inter-process or inter-system communication.
-
Verify TLS encryption on gRPC channelsInspect gRPC server and client configuration for 'ssl' or 'tls' settings, or inspect the connection setup code for credentials configuration.Affected if TLS encryption is NOT enabled on the gRPC channels used for LeRobot communication.
-
Confirm authentication is enforced on gRPC serviceReview gRPC service configuration or code to determine if authentication tokens, credentials, or mTLS are required for client connections.Affected if Authentication is NOT required or enforced on the gRPC service endpoints.
You are affected if LeRobot version 0.5.1 or lower is installed AND gRPC communication channels lack both TLS encryption and authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedReplace pickle deserialization with safe formats (e.g., JSON, MessagePack) and implement TLS with mutual authentication on all gRPC channels to prevent unauthenticated deserialization attacks.
Latest stable release after version 0.5.1 that incorporates the PR #3048 fix
- 1. Review the patch details at the vendor PR: https://github.com/huggingface/lerobot/pull/3048 to understand the code changes made
- 2. Ensure all policy server and robot client deployments are identified in your environment
- 3. If a patched release is available (version > 0.5.1), upgrade all LeRobot instances to the latest stable release
- 4. If no patched release is available yet, apply the code changes from PR #3048 which removes unsafe pickle.loads() usage
- 5. After patching, verify the gRPC channels now use proper serialization (such as JSON, protobuf, or safe object serialization)
- 6. Enable TLS on all gRPC communications between policy server and robot clients
- 7. Implement authentication on gRPC endpoints if not already present
- 8. Test the inference pipeline to confirm normal operation after changes
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation24.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $13,440.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-25874 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-25874 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data