FuxaApplication · Frangoteam

CVE-2026-25894

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-02-09
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.2.10 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click Patch available

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. An insecure default configuration in FUXA allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain administrative access and execute arbitrary code on the server. This affects FUXA through version 1.2.9 when authentication is enabled, but the administrator JWT secret is not configured. This issue has been patched in FUXA version 1.2.10.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

FUXA versions through 1.2.9 contain an insecure default configuration where authentication can be enabled without a configured administrator JWT secret. When this misconfiguration exists, unauthenticated remote attackers can obtain administrative access by bypassing JWT validation, leading to arbitrary code execution on the server.

MitigationUpgrade to FUXA version 1.2.10 or later and ensure a strong administrator JWT secret is properly configured when authentication is enabled.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FuxaApplication
Affected:< 1.2.10

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed FUXA version
    Locate the version number in the FUXA installation - typically found in package.json file in the application root directory, or by accessing the /api/version endpoint if available
    Affected if version is earlier than 1.2.10
  2. Check if authentication is enabled
    Review the FUXA server configuration file (commonly settings.json or similar) for the 'authentication' or 'auth' setting
    Affected if authentication setting is set to true or enabled
  3. Verify JWT secret configuration
    Examine the configuration file for the administrator JWT secret parameter - look for fields like 'jwtSecret', 'adminSecret', or similar authentication-related secret configurations
    Affected if the JWT secret field is absent, empty, set to a default value, or contains a weak/placeholder secret string
  4. Confirm authentication bypass exposure
    Test whether unauthenticated API endpoints that should require admin privileges are accessible - specifically check if administrative API routes accept requests without a valid JWT token
    Affected if administrative functions are accessible without valid authentication tokens or with manipulated/empty tokens
  5. Review server startup logs
    Check FUXA server startup logs for warnings about missing or weak JWT secret configuration during initialization
    Affected if logs indicate authentication is enabled but no proper JWT secret was configured

A FUXA installation is affected if it runs version earlier than 1.2.10 with authentication enabled and either lacks a configured administrator JWT secret or uses a default/weak secret, allowing potential administrative access bypass.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.2.10 or later
Fixed in 1.2.10
Vendor patch github.com →
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to FUXA version 1.2.10 or later and ensure a strong administrator JWT secret is properly configured when authentication is enabled.

Recommended fix High confidence

1.2.10

  1. Upgrade FUXA to version 1.2.10 or later using your deployment method (npm, Docker, or binary)
  2. After upgrading, verify that a strong JWT secret is configured in your settings.json or environment variables (setting 'jwtSecret' under the 'server' configuration section)

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Fuxa Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-25894 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-25894 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data