CVE-2026-2590
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper enforcement of the Disable password saving in vaults setting in the connection entry component in Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager 2025.3.30 and earlier allows an authenticated user to persist credentials in vault entries, potentially exposing sensitive information to other users, by creating or editing certain connection types while password saving is disabled.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIn Remote Desktop Manager 2025.3.30 and earlier, the 'Disable password saving in vaults' setting is not properly enforced in the connection entry component. An authenticated user can create or edit certain connection types to persist credentials in vault entries even when password saving is disabled, potentially exposing sensitive credentials to other users who access the same vault.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2025.3.30.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Remote Desktop Manager versionOpen Remote Desktop Manager and navigate to Help > About, or check the installed version in Windows Programs and Features. Compare your version number to 2025.3.30.0.Affected if Installed version is 2025.3.30.0 or earlier
-
Verify vault functionality is configuredExamine whether any vaults are created or active in your Remote Desktop Manager installation by checking the vault panel or configuration files.Affected if Vaults are created and users have access to them
-
Confirm 'Disable password saving in vaults' settingLocate the security or vault settings in Remote Desktop Manager and verify whether the option to disable password saving in vaults is enabled or disabled.Affected if The setting exists and is intended to be enabled but passwords can still be saved to vaults by users
-
Test credential persistence behaviorAs an authenticated user with vault access, attempt to create or edit a connection entry and observe whether credentials are saved to the vault when password saving should be blocked.Affected if Credentials persist in vault entries despite the password saving restriction being configured
If your installed version is 2025.3.30.0 or earlier and vault functionality is in use, the vulnerability applies and credentials may be exposed to other vault users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to Remote Desktop Manager version 2025.3.31 or later when released. In the interim, consider restricting vault access permissions or disabling vault functionality for untrusted users until the patch is applied.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-2590 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-2590 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data