CVE-2026-25962
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMarkUs is a web application for the submission and grading of student assignments. Prior to version 2.9.4, MarkUs currently extracts zip files without any size or entry-count limits. For example, instructors can upload a zip file to provide an assignment configuration; students can upload a zip file for an assignment submission and indicate its contents should be extracted. This issue has been patched in version 2.9.4.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMarkUs versions prior to 2.9.4 lack validation when extracting uploaded ZIP files, allowing unlimited file sizes and entry counts during extraction. This enables resource exhaustion attacks via ZIP bombs or excessive disk consumption when students/instructors upload ZIP files for assignment submissions or configuration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.9.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed MarkUs versionLocate the MarkUs version file, gem specification, or access the application About page (typically /about) to retrieve the running version numberAffected if The installed version is prior to 2.9.4
-
Confirm ZIP upload feature is in useCheck if assignment submissions or configuration allow ZIP file uploads by reviewing the application's submission settings or testing file upload functionalityAffected if Users can upload ZIP files for assignments or configuration purposes
-
Verify ZIP extraction limits existSearch application configuration files (such as config/application.rb, config/environments/*.rb, or initializers) for parameters that limit ZIP file size or entry count during extractionAffected if No extraction limits are configured or the application lacks code to validate ZIP file sizes and entry counts before extraction
-
Check for ZIP bomb protectionInspect the ZIP extraction code in the codebase (likely in models or controllers handling file uploads) for explicit validation of compression ratios or entry limitsAffected if The extraction routine performs no validation of zip entry count or decompressed size limits
You are affected if the installed MarkUs version is below 2.9.4 AND the application accepts ZIP file uploads for assignments or configuration without extraction limits in place.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.9.4
Upgrade to MarkUs version 2.9.4 or later which implements size and entry-count limits for ZIP extraction. If immediate upgrade is not possible, implement application-level limits on ZIP file size and number of entries before extraction.
2.9.4
- Verify current installed version of MarkUs by checking the application or configuration files
- Backup the current MarkUs installation and database before proceeding with the upgrade
- Upgrade MarkUs to version 2.9.4 or later by following the project's upgrade documentation (typically involves pulling the latest release or updating the gem/pip packages)
- Verify that zip file extraction now includes size and entry-count limits
- Test the zip upload functionality to confirm the fix works as expected
- Monitor application logs for any extraction-related errors
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-25962 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-25962 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data