CVE-2026-25987
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to versions 7.1.2-15 and 6.9.13-40, a heap buffer over-read vulnerability exists in the MAP image decoder when processing crafted MAP files, potentially leading to crashes or unintended memory disclosure during image decoding. Versions 7.1.2-15 and 6.9.13-40 contain a patch.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA heap buffer over-read vulnerability exists in ImageMagick's MAP image decoder when processing crafted MAP files. This can lead to crashes or unintended memory disclosure (potential information disclosure) during image decoding. The vulnerability is present in versions prior to 7.1.2-15 and 6.9.13-40.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.9.13-40>= 7.0.0-0, < 7.1.2-15CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed ImageMagick versionRun 'magick -version' or 'identify -version' to obtain the installed version numberAffected if Version is below 6.9.13-40 for the 6.x line, or below 7.1.2-15 for the 7.x line (but 7.0.0-0 or higher)
-
Verify MAP decoder is availableRun 'magick -list configure | grep -i map' or check for 'MAP' in the list of supported formats via 'magick -list format'Affected if MAP format is listed as supported and loaded
-
Check MAP file processing capabilityAttempt to identify a sample MAP file (e.g., 'identify sample.map') or check if the MAP coder module exists in the ImageMagick modules directoryAffected if The MAP decoder can process input files, indicating the vulnerable code path is present
-
Review ImageMagick policy configurationExamine /etc/ImageMagick-6/policy.xml or /etc/ImageMagick-7/policy.xml (or the active policy file) for any restrictions on MAP formatAffected if MAP format is not explicitly blocked in the security policy, allowing processing of potentially crafted files
A system is affected if it runs ImageMagick version 6.9.13-40 or earlier (6.x line), or version 7.0.0-0 through 7.1.2-14 (7.x line), AND the MAP image decoder is enabled and capable of processing MAP files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.9.13-407.1.2-15
Upgrade ImageMagick to version 7.1.2-15 or later, or 6.9.13-40 or later. If immediate patching is not feasible, consider disabling MAP file format support or implementing input validation for MAP files at the application layer.
ImageMagick 6.9.13-40 (6.x branch) or 7.1.2-15 (7.x branch)
- 1. Identify the currently installed ImageMagick version using 'convert --version' or 'magick --version'
- 2. If using ImageMagick 6.x branch (6.9.13-x), upgrade to version 6.9.13-40 or later
- 3. If using ImageMagick 7.x branch (7.0.x - 7.1.2-x), upgrade to version 7.1.2-15 or later
- 4. On Debian/Ubuntu: Run 'sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install imagemagick' to get the latest packaged version
- 5. On RHEL/CentOS/Fedora: Run 'sudo dnf update imagemagick' or 'sudo yum update imagemagick'
- 6. On macOS with Homebrew: Run 'brew update && brew upgrade imagemagick'
- 7. Verify the new version is installed: 'convert --version' or 'magick --version'
- 8. Test that ImageMagick functions correctly with your workflows
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-25987 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-25987 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data