FreerdpApplication

CVE-2026-25997

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-02-25
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.23.0 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Public exploit Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click Patch available

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
FreeRDP is a free implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol. Prior to version 3.23.0, `xf_clipboard_format_equal` reads freed `lastSentFormats` memory because `xf_clipboard_formats_free` (called from the cliprdr channel thread during auto-reconnect) frees the array while the X11 event thread concurrently iterates it in `xf_clipboard_changed`, triggering a heap use after free. Version 3.23.0 fixes the issue.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Heap use-after-free vulnerability in FreeRDP's clipboard handling where a race condition exists between the cliprdr channel thread (which frees `lastSentFormats` via `xf_clipboard_formats_free` during auto-reconnect) and the X11 event thread (which iterates the same array in `xf_clipboard_changed` and reads freed memory in `xf_clipboard_format_equal`). This concurrent access without proper synchronization can lead to arbitrary code execution.

MitigationUpgrade to FreeRDP version 3.23.0 or later. As an immediate workaround, consider disabling clipboard synchronization or restricting network exposure until the patch can be applied.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FreerdpApplication
Affected:< 3.23.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check FreeRDP version
    Run `freerdp-version` or `xfreerdp --version` to display the installed FreeRDP version number
    Affected if The reported version is less than 3.23.0 (e.g., 3.22.0, 3.0.x, 2.x)
  2. Identify running FreeRDP processes
    Run `ps aux | grep -i freerdp` to list any active FreeRDP client processes
    Affected if FreeRDP processes are running and their version is below 3.23.0
  3. Verify clipboard redirection is enabled
    Inspect the connection command or configuration for the `/clipboard` or `-clipboard` parameter, or check if clipboard sync works in an active session
    Affected if Clipboard redirection is enabled (the default setting) and the FreeRDP version is vulnerable
  4. Check for cliprdr channel usage
    Review session logs or connection parameters for evidence of the cliprdr (clipboard) channel being negotiated and active
    Affected if The cliprdr channel is present in the session and the FreeRDP version is below 3.23.0

You are affected if you are running any FreeRDP version prior to 3.23.0 with clipboard synchronization enabled and the cliprdr channel in use, as this creates the race condition window for the use-after-free vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.23.0 or later
Fixed in 3.23.0
Vendor patch github.com →
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to FreeRDP version 3.23.0 or later. As an immediate workaround, consider disabling clipboard synchronization or restricting network exposure until the patch can be applied.

Recommended fix High confidence

3.23.0

  1. Check current FreeRDP version using 'freerdp-version' or 'xfreerdp --version'
  2. Upgrade FreeRDP to version 3.23.0 or later via package manager (e.g., 'apt update && apt install freerdp' or equivalent) or rebuild from source
  3. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version again
  4. Restart any running FreeRDP sessions to ensure the patched version is loaded

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Freerdp Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-25997 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-25997 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data