CVE-2026-26045
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was identified in Moodle’s backup restore functionality where specially crafted backup files were not properly validated during processing. If a malicious backup file is restored, it could lead to unintended execution of server-side code. Since restore capabilities are typically available to privileged users, exploitation requires authenticated access. Successful exploitation could result in full compromise of the Moodle server.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA code injection vulnerability exists in Moodle's backup restore functionality where malicious backup files are not properly validated during restore processing, allowing authenticated privileged users to achieve remote code execution on the Moodle server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 4.5.9>= 5.0.0, < 5.0.5>= 5.1.0, < 5.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed Moodle versionLog into Moodle as administrator and navigate to Site Administration > Server > Environment, or check the version.php file in the Moodle root directory (look for $version variable)Affected if The installed version falls within < 4.5.9, OR >= 5.0.0 and < 5.0.5, OR >= 5.1.0 and < 5.1.2
-
Verify backup restore capability is availableCheck if the backup and restore capabilities are enabled for any roles by navigating to Site Administration > Users > Permissions > Define roles and searching for 'backup' or 'restore' capabilities, or examine the role capabilities table in the databaseAffected if Any authenticated privileged user role has the capability to perform course backups or restores (moodle/backup:backup, moodle/restore:restore)
-
Identify users with restore privilegesRun a database query to find users assigned roles with restore permissions, or navigate to Site Administration > Users > Permissions > Assign system roles and review which roles have restore capabilitiesAffected if There are users with restore capabilities beyond the primary administrator account
-
Confirm restore functionality is accessibleAttempt to access the restore interface at /backup/restore.php on the Moodle server, or verify that the restore functionality is not disabled in Site Administration > Plugins > Activity modules > BackupAffected if The restore interface is accessible and the restore functionality is enabled in the plugin settings
You are affected if your Moodle installation version matches any of the affected ranges AND the backup/restore functionality is enabled with privileged users having restore capabilities.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.5.95.0.55.1.2
Restrict backup restore permissions to minimal trusted administrators, validate backup file structure before restore, and apply Moodle security patches when released.
Moodle 4.5.9 (for 4.x branches), Moodle 5.0.5 (for 5.0.x), or Moodle 5.1.2 (for 5.1.x) - choose the earliest fixed version >= your current branch
- 1. Identify the currently installed Moodle version by checking the version.php file in the Moodle root directory
- 2. If running a version < 4.5.9, plan upgrade to Moodle 4.5.9 or later
- 3. If running version 5.0.x (>= 5.0.0 and < 5.0.5), plan upgrade to Moodle 5.0.5 or later
- 4. If running version 5.1.x (>= 5.1.0 and < 5.1.2), plan upgrade to Moodle 5.1.2 or later
- 5. Before upgrading, perform a full backup of the Moodle database and moodledata directory
- 6. Review the Moodle upgrade documentation for the specific version path being taken
- 7. Download the appropriate Moodle release from https://moodle.org/
- 8. Place the site in maintenance mode via Site Administration > Server > Maintenance Mode
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,464.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-26045 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-26045 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data