CVE-2026-26097
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUncontrolled Search Path Element in Owl opds 2.2.0.4 allows Leveraging/Manipulating Configuration File Search Paths via a crafted network request.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOwl opds version 2.2.0.4 contains an Uncontrolled Search Path Element vulnerability (CWE-427) where the application uses unsanitized paths when searching for configuration files. An attacker can exploit this by sending crafted network requests to manipulate where the application searches for or loads configuration files, potentially causing it to load malicious configurations from attacker-controlled locations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.2.0.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed version of Owl Opds TalonCheck the product version using the system's package manager, software inventory, or application metadata (often visible in the application UI, about page, or installed binaries)Affected if The installed version is exactly 2.2.0.4
-
Examine configuration file loading mechanismsReview application configuration files and logs to determine how and from which paths configuration files are loaded. Look for settings that specify directories or paths used during configuration resolution.Affected if Configuration file paths are derived from user-controllable input, environment variables, or unsanitized path settings
-
Check for path-related parameters in configurationInspect the application's configuration files (e.g., config.xml, settings.conf, or similar) for parameters that control where configuration files are searched for or loaded fromAffected if Path parameters allow external manipulation or point to writable locations
-
Verify configuration directory permissionsCheck file system permissions on directories where the application stores or searches for configuration files to ensure they are not writable by untrusted usersAffected if Configuration directories are writable by untrusted users or processes
-
Review network request handling for path injectionAnalyze how the application handles network requests that may influence configuration file paths - check if request parameters can influence path resolutionAffected if Network requests can inject or manipulate paths used for configuration loading
-
Audit application logs for suspicious configuration loadingReview application logs for any unusual configuration file loading attempts, particularly from unexpected directories or locationsAffected if Logs show configuration files being loaded from non-standard or unexpected locations
You are affected if Owl Opds Talon version 2.2.0.4 is installed AND the application allows configuration file paths to be influenced by external input or loads configurations from user-controllable locations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict path validation and use absolute, hardcoded paths for configuration file locations. Remove or restrict any user-controllable path parameters in configuration file resolution, and ensure configuration files are loaded only from trusted, non-writable locations.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-26097 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-26097 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data