CVE-2026-26118
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedServer-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure MCP Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceServer-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Azure MCP Server enables an authorized attacker to induce the server to make arbitrary network requests, potentially accessing internal services, cloud metadata endpoints, or bypassing network segmentation to elevate privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.0.0= 2.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Azure MCP Server is deployedReview your installed applications, containers, or services for Microsoft Azure MCP Server. Check running processes or deployed resources in your Azure environment for 'mcp', 'mcp server', or 'Model Context Protocol' related components.Affected if Azure MCP Server is present in the environment
-
Determine the installed versionRun 'dotnet list package' for .NET deployments, check the installed package version in your dependency manifest, or query the MCP Server service version if exposed via --version flag. Compare against the affected range: versions < 2.0.0 and = 2.0.0.Affected if The installed version is 2.0.0 or any earlier version (versions prior to 2.0.1)
-
Verify the MCP Server is accessible to network requestsCheck if the MCP Server is exposed on a network interface or port that accepts incoming connections. Review firewall rules, network security groups, or reverse proxy configurations that allow external or internal clients to reach the MCP Server service.Affected if The MCP Server is network-accessible to authorized users or applications
-
Check for unusual outbound network activityReview network logs, proxy logs, or Azure Network Watcher flow logs for outbound requests from the MCP Server host to internal IP ranges (10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16) or cloud metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254 for Azure).Affected if The server is making outbound requests to internal or metadata addresses that were not intentionally configured
You are affected if Azure MCP Server is running and the installed version is 2.0.0 or any earlier version, especially if the service is network-accessible to authorized attackers who could exploit the SSRF to make arbitrary requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.0.0
Apply Microsoft's security patch when available; implement network segmentation and restrict outbound connectivity from the MCP Server to minimize exposure; monitor for unusual outbound requests to internal/cloud metadata addresses.
Azure MCP Server >= 2.0.1
- 1. Identify current Azure MCP Server version using 'az mcp version' or checking installed packages
- 2. Download or install Azure MCP Server version 2.0.1 or later from official Microsoft sources
- 3. Backup current configuration files before upgrading
- 4. Stop the Azure MCP Server service
- 5. Install the updated version (e.g., 'pip install azure-mcp-server>=2.0.1' or use appropriate package manager)
- 6. Verify the installation succeeded by checking the version
- 7. Start the Azure MCP Server service
- 8. Test that SSRF vulnerability is remediated by verifying the server no longer makes arbitrary HTTP requests to unauthorized internal resources
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-26118 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-26118 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data