CVE-2026-26232
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGitea versions before 1.25.5 do not consistently enforce OAuth2 authorization code expiry and single-use behavior during token exchange.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceGitea versions before 1.25.5 fail to properly enforce OAuth2 authorization code expiration and single-use constraints during token exchange, potentially allowing attackers to reuse authorization codes to obtain unauthorized access tokens.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Gitea versionRun `gitea --version` or check the admin dashboard UI footer to find the installed version numberAffected if The installed version is earlier than 1.25.5 (for example, 1.25.4, 1.24.x, or earlier)
-
Confirm OAuth2 authentication is in useInspect the Gitea authentication configuration (via admin panel or configuration file) to verify that at least one OAuth2 provider is enabledAffected if OAuth2 providers are configured and active in the Gitea instance
-
Check OAuth2 provider settingsReview the OAuth2 provider configuration in `app.ini` or through the web admin interface to confirm authorization code flow is in useAffected if OAuth2 providers are configured to use the authorization code grant type
You are affected if your Gitea version is before 1.25.5 AND you have OAuth2 authentication providers configured using the authorization code flow.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Gitea to version 1.25.5 or later to apply the patch that properly enforces OAuth2 authorization code expiry and single-use behavior.
1.25.5
- Back up your current Gitea instance (database, configuration, and repository data)
- Stop the running Gitea service
- Download Gitea version 1.25.5 from the official releases (e.g., https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases/tag/v1.25.5)
- Replace the existing Gitea binary with the new version
- Verify file permissions are correct for the new binary
- Start the Gitea service
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the Gitea version in the admin panel or via command line
- Test OAuth2 authentication flows to confirm the vulnerability is remediated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-26232 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-26232 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data