CVE-2026-26233
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMattermost versions 11.4.x <= 11.4.0, 11.3.x <= 11.3.1, 11.2.x <= 11.2.3, 10.11.x <= 10.11.11 fail to rate limit login requests which allows unauthenticated remote attackers to cause denial of service (server crash and restart) via HTTP/2 single packet attack with 100+ parallel login requests.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2025-00566
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMattermost fails to implement rate limiting on login endpoints, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to send 100+ parallel login requests via HTTP/2 single packet attack. This causes the server to crash and restart, resulting in denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.11.0, < 10.11.12>= 11.2.0, < 11.2.4>= 11.3.0, < 11.3.2>= 11.4.0, < 11.4.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed Mattermost Server versionRun 'mattermost version' or check the system package manager for the installed Mattermost version, or look in the Mattermost configuration file for the version fieldAffected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: 10.11.0 to 10.11.11, 11.2.0 to 11.2.3, 11.3.0 to 11.3.1, or 11.4.0 to 11.4.0 (meaning version is >=10.11.0 and <10.11.12, or >=11.2.0 and <11.2.4, or >=11.3.0 and <11.3.2, or >=11.4.0 and <11.4.1)
-
Locate Mattermost configuration fileFind the config.json or config.d directory in the Mattermost installation directory, typically under /opt/mattermost/config/ or /etc/mattermost/Affected if The configuration file exists and can be inspected for rate limiting settings
-
Check rate limiting configuration for authentication endpointsExamine the Mattermost configuration file for rate limit settings, specifically look for 'RateLimitSettings' or similar sections that control login request rate limitingAffected if Rate limiting is disabled, set to false, set to 0, or not configured at all for login/authentication endpoints (the 'Enable' or 'PerIP' settings are missing or set to allow unlimited requests)
-
Verify rate limiting is not externally implementedCheck if fail2ban, a web application firewall, or other external rate limiting is configured specifically for Mattermost login endpointsAffected if No external rate limiting mechanism (fail2ban, WAF, iptables rules) is configured to limit login attempts to the Mattermost server
You are affected if your Mattermost Server version is within the affected ranges AND rate limiting is not enabled on login endpoints, either through Mattermost configuration or an external mechanism.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.11.1211.2.411.3.2
Implement rate limiting on authentication endpoints (e.g., fail2ban, web application firewall, or Mattermost configuration) to restrict login attempts per IP, or upgrade to patched versions when available.
Mattermost Server 10.11.12, 11.2.4, 11.3.2, or 11.4.1 (choose the version appropriate for your release branch)
- Identify your current Mattermost Server version by checking the system console or running 'mattermost version'
- Backup your Mattermost database and configuration files before upgrading
- Upgrade to Mattermost Server version 10.11.12 or later if running 10.11.x
- Upgrade to version 11.2.4 or later if running 11.2.x
- Upgrade to version 11.3.2 or later if running 11.3.x
- Upgrade to version 11.4.1 or later if running 11.4.x
- After upgrade, verify the server is running and accessible
- Confirm rate limiting is functioning by testing login endpoint throttling
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-26233 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-26233 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data