CVE-2026-26247
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGitea versions before 1.25.5 do not persist the OAuth2 PKCE S256 challenge method correctly during authorization, allowing token exchange without the expected verifier check.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceGitea before 1.25.5 fails to correctly persist the OAuth2 PKCE S256 code challenge method during the authorization flow, allowing an attacker who intercepts an authorization code to exchange it for tokens without providing the correct code verifier, effectively bypassing the PKCE protection mechanism.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed Gitea versionRun 'gitea --version' or check the version file in your Gitea installation directoryAffected if The version number is less than 1.25.5
-
Verify OAuth2 provider is enabledReview your Gitea configuration file (usually app.ini) for the [oauth2] section and ensure ENABLE is set to trueAffected if OAuth2 authentication is enabled in the configuration
-
List existing OAuth2 applicationsNavigate to Site Administration > OAuth2 Applications in the Gitea web interface or query the database for oauth2_application recordsAffected if One or more OAuth2 applications exist in your Gitea instance
-
Audit OAuth2 authorization grants for anomaliesCheck the oauth2_authorization_grant table or review grant records via Site Administration > OAuth2 Grants for unexpected or unauthorized authorization entriesAffected if There are authorization grants that were created without proper code_verifier validation or appear suspicious
Your environment is affected if you are running Gitea version 1.25.4 or earlier with OAuth2 authentication enabled and have OAuth2 applications configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Gitea to version 1.25.5 or later to receive the PKCE S256 persistence fix; if immediate upgrade is not possible, monitor for unauthorized OAuth2 token exchanges and review OAuth2 application grants for suspicious activity.
Gitea 1.25.5
- 1. Back up your current Gitea installation and database before upgrading.
- 2. Download Gitea version 1.25.5 from the official releases page at https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases
- 3. Replace the existing Gitea binary with the new version 1.25.5 binary.
- 4. Ensure the new binary has appropriate execute permissions.
- 5. Restart the Gitea service to apply the update.
- 6. Verify the service is running correctly and test OAuth2 authentication flows to confirm the PKCE fix is working.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-26247 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-26247 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data