CVE-2026-26291
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedStored cross-site scripting vulnerability exists in GROWI v7.4.6 and earlier. If this vulnerability is exploited, an arbitrary script may be executed in a user's web browser.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceStored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in GROWI v7.4.6 and earlier allows attackers to inject malicious JavaScript that persists in the application and executes in the browsers of users who view the contaminated content.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed GROWI versionAccess the GROWI admin interface and navigate to the 'System Information' or 'About' page, or check the package.json/version file in the GROWI installation directoryAffected if The displayed version is v7.4.6 or any earlier version (e.g., v7.4.5, v7.4.0, v7.3.x)
-
Confirm the GROWI service is runningVerify that the GROWI application is currently operational and accessible via its web URLAffected if The application is running and responds to requests
-
Verify user-generated content input existsLog into GROWI as a standard user and check if you can create or edit content using features such as wiki pages, comments, or posts that accept user-supplied textAffected if The ability to create or edit user-generated content is enabled and functional
-
Inspect for existing injected scripts in stored contentReview the database or use GROWI's search feature to examine stored page content, comments, and user profiles for suspicious script tags, event handlers, or javascript: URLsAffected if Any stored content contains unencoded <script> tags, javascript: protocols, or HTML event attributes like onload, onerror, or onclick
A GROWI instance is affected if it runs version v7.4.6 or earlier AND allows user-generated content to be stored, as the stored XSS can persist and execute when other users view the contaminated content.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade GROWI to a version newer than v7.4.6; apply vendor-released patches for XSS protection and implement output encoding for user-generated content.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-26291 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-26291 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data