OS Command InjectionWeakness · CWE-78

CVE-2026-2630

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-02-17
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A Command Injection vulnerability exists where an authenticated, remote attacker could execute arbitrary code on the underlying server where Tenable Security Center is hosted.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Command Injection vulnerability in Tenable Security Center allowing an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the underlying host server. The attacker needs valid credentials to exploit this flaw, but can then inject and execute commands with the privileges of the application.

MitigationApply vendor-provided patches/updates for Tenable Security Center as soon as they are released. Limit the number of user accounts with administrative access and follow least-privilege principles to reduce the impact of credential compromise.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Tenable Security Center is installed
    Check for Tenable Security Center processes running on the host (e.g., 'SecurityCenter' process, or look for installation directories like /opt/sc, /opt/Tenable/SecurityCenter, or C:\Program Files\Tenable\SecurityCenter)
    Affected if Tenable Security Center is installed and running on the system
  2. Determine the installed version
    Check the version of Tenable Security Center. On Linux, run: rpm -q SecurityCenter or ls /opt/sc/etc/version 2>/dev/null. On Windows, check the application version via the UI or in the registry at HKLM\SOFTWARE\Tenable\SecurityCenter\Version
    Affected if The installed version is within the affected range and has not been patched
  3. Verify remote authentication is enabled
    Review Security Center configuration for enabled authentication methods (LDAP, Active Directory, local accounts) and check if remote access is permitted in /opt/sc/etc/securitycenter.conf or through the web interface under Users > Authentication
    Affected if Remote authentication is enabled, allowing external attackers to potentially obtain valid credentials
  4. Check for suspicious command execution
    Review system logs and Tenable Security Center audit logs for unusual commands. Look in /opt/sc/logs/ (Linux) or C:\ProgramData\Tenable\SecurityCenter\logs\ (Windows) for unexpected system commands, especially from the 'SecurityCenter' user account
    Affected if Audit logs show unexpected or unauthorized commands executed with application privileges
  5. Inspect for unauthorized user accounts
    Examine the Security Center user database for unexpected accounts: query the database (e.g., SELECT username FROM users) or review user list via the web interface under Users > Users
    Affected if Unexpected administrative or privileged accounts exist that may indicate compromise

You are affected if Tenable Security Center is running with an unpatched version and remote authentication is enabled, allowing authenticated attackers to inject and execute commands with application privileges.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-provided patches/updates for Tenable Security Center as soon as they are released. Limit the number of user accounts with administrative access and follow least-privilege principles to reduce the impact of credential compromise.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,580
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,128.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-2630 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-2630 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data