CVE-2026-26337
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHyland Alfresco Transformation Service allows unauthenticated attackers to achieve both arbitrary file read and server-side request forgery through the absolute path traversal.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceHyland Alfresco Transformation Service contains an absolute path traversal vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to read arbitrary files on the server filesystem and perform server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks. The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation of file path inputs, enabling attackers to specify absolute paths to access sensitive files or make arbitrary HTTP requests through the affected service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 4.3< 5.3.0= 5.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Hyland Alfresco Transform Service versionLocate the installation directory and check the version file or use the product's version command. Common locations include the service configuration or logs. Compare the installed version number against the affected range of versions prior to 4.3.Affected if The installed version is lower than 4.3 (for example, 4.0, 4.1, 4.2)
-
Identify Hyland Alfresco Transform Core versionLocate the Transform Core component and check its version. This may be a separate module or service. Compare against the affected ranges of versions prior to 5.3.0 or equal to 5.3.0.Affected if The installed version is lower than 5.3.0 or exactly 5.3.0 (for example, 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, or 5.3.0)
-
Confirm transformation service is network accessibleDetermine if the transformation service API endpoints are exposed to the network. Check firewall rules, service binding configuration, and network access controls. The vulnerability is exploitable by unauthenticated attackers if the service is reachable over the network.Affected if The transformation service is accessible from untrusted networks without authentication barriers
-
Inspect transformation endpoint path parametersIf accessible, examine the transformation service API endpoints that accept file or path parameters. Look for endpoints that process transformation requests where absolute file paths could be supplied as input.Affected if The service accepts path parameters in transformation requests without validation preventing absolute paths
A user is affected if their environment runs Hyland Alfresco Transform Service below version 4.3 or Transform Core below version 5.3.0 (or exactly 5.3.0) and the transformation service is network-accessible with endpoints that accept path parameters.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.35.3.0
Implement strict input validation and path sanitization to restrict file access to allowed directories and prevent path traversal sequences. Consider adding authentication requirements and network segmentation to limit the attack surface for this service.
Alfresco Transform Service >= 4.3; Alfresco Transform Core >= 5.3.1
- Identify the exact Alfresco Transform Service and Transform Core versions currently deployed
- For Alfresco Transform Service: upgrade to version 4.3 or later
- For Alfresco Transform Core: upgrade to version 5.3.1 or later
- Verify the upgrade in a non-production environment first
- Test that transformation workflows function correctly after upgrade
- Deploy the updated versions to production
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-26337 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-26337 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data