CVE-2026-26341
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedTattile Smart+, Vega, and Basic device families firmware versions 1.181.5 and prior ship with default credentials that are not forced to be changed during installation or commissioning. An attacker who can reach the management interface can authenticate using the default credentials and gain administrative access, enabling unauthorized access to device configuration and data.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceTattile Smart+, Vega, and Basic device families ship with firmware version 1.181.5 and prior containing default administrative credentials that are not forced to be changed during installation or commissioning. An attacker who can reach the management interface (typically on the local network) can authenticate using these well-known default credentials and gain full administrative access to the device, allowing unauthorized modification of configuration and access to stored data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.181.5<= 1.181.5<= 1.181.5<= 1.181.5<= 1.181.5<= 1.181.5<= 1.181.5<= 1.181.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Tattile devices on your networkScan your network for devices with Tattile vendor identifiers. Check DHCP logs, network scans, or device inventories for Tattile Smart+, Tolling+, Speed, Traffic Light, Axle Counter, or Vega series devices (Vega53, Vega33, Vega11).Affected if Any Tattile device from the listed product families is found on the network.
-
Check the installed firmware versionAccess the device web management interface (typically via HTTP/HTTPS on the local network). Navigate to the System, About, or Firmware Information page to view the installed firmware version.Affected if The firmware version is 1.181.5 or lower.
-
Verify default credential statusCheck the device configuration for administrative accounts. Look for the built-in administrator account and determine whether its password has been changed from the factory default. This may be visible in the User Management or Accounts section of the web interface, or via SNMP read of user tables if enabled.Affected if The default administrative account password has not been changed from the factory default value.
-
Assess management interface exposureReview network firewall rules and access control lists to determine if the device web management interface (ports 80/443 or custom ports) is reachable from network segments outside of the trusted local management network.Affected if The management interface is accessible from network segments beyond the trusted administrative VLAN or directly from untrusted networks.
A user is affected if they have any Tattile device from the listed families running firmware version 1.181.5 or lower where the default administrative account password remains unchanged and the management interface is reachable from their network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImmediately change all default credentials on affected devices to strong, unique passwords; disable or rename default administrative accounts if the firmware supports this; implement network segmentation and access controls to limit exposure of the management interface to authorized personnel only.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-26341 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-26341 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data