Improper Privilege ManagementWeakness · CWE-269

CVE-2026-2640

MEDIUM · 5.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-03-11
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
57/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
During an internal security assessment, a potential vulnerability was discovered in Lenovo PC Manager that could allow a local authenticated user to terminate privileged processes.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A local authenticated user can terminate privileged processes in Lenovo PC Manager due to insufficient access control on process termination functionality. This allows a standard user to kill system or elevated processes, potentially causing denial of service or aiding in further attack chains.

MitigationRestrict process termination functionality to only allow users with appropriate privileges to terminate protected processes, or implement proper authorization checks before allowing process termination.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Lenovo PC Manager is installed
    Check for Lenovo PC Manager in program files (C:\Program Files\Lenovo\Lenovo PC Manager or C:\Program Files (x86)\Lenovo\Lenovo PC Manager) or query the Windows registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall for entries containing 'Lenovo PC Manager'
    Affected if Lenovo PC Manager is found installed on the system
  2. Determine installed version of Lenovo PC Manager
    Right-click the Lenovo PC Manager executable in Program Files, select Properties, then look at the Details tab for the File Version, or query the registry uninstall key for the DisplayVersion value
    Affected if The installed version matches or falls within any affected version range (compare against Lenovo's official security advisory for this CVE)
  3. Verify current user account type
    Run 'whoami /groups' or check System Properties to confirm if the current account is a standard user (not an administrator)
    Affected if The user is a standard (non-privileged) local account
  4. Test process termination from standard user context
    As a standard (non-admin) user, attempt to terminate a privileged or system process (such as a service running under SYSTEM or a known elevated process) using Task Manager, Taskkill command, or Process Explorer - verify if termination succeeds without UAC prompt
    Affected if A standard user can successfully terminate privileged or system processes through Lenovo PC Manager functionality
  5. Check for event logs indicating process termination abuse
    Review Windows Security event logs (Event Viewer > Windows Logs > Security) and Lenovo PC Manager logs in %ProgramData%\Lenovo\ LenovoPCManager\logs for event ID 4689 (process termination) or suspicious termination patterns originating from standard user sessions
    Affected if Event logs show privileged process terminations initiated by standard user accounts

A system is affected if Lenovo PC Manager is installed and a standard (non-administrator) user can successfully terminate privileged or system processes due to missing access controls.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Restrict process termination functionality to only allow users with appropriate privileges to terminate protected processes, or implement proper authorization checks before allowing process termination.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-2640 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-2640 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data