CVE-2026-2663
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security vulnerability has been detected in Alixhan xh-admin-backend up to 1.7.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /frontend-api/system-service/api/system/role/query of the component Database Query Handler. Such manipulation of the argument prop leads to sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Alixhan xh-admin-backend (versions up to 1.7.0) in the role query endpoint at /frontend-api/system-service/api/system/role/query. The 'prop' parameter is not properly sanitized, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands via the Database Query Handler component.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Alixhan xh-admin-backend is installedIdentify the application by examining deployed artifacts, service names, or process listings that indicate xh-admin-backend is present in the environmentAffected if The application is Alixhan xh-admin-backend
-
Determine installed versionCheck version information from application metadata, build files, startup logs, or any version configuration (compare against the affected range of version 1.7.0 and below)Affected if Version is 1.7.0 or lower
-
Verify the vulnerable endpoint existsConfirm that the route /frontend-api/system-service/api/system/role/query is exposed in the deployed applicationAffected if The role query endpoint is accessible
-
Inspect 'prop' parameter handlingReview the code or configuration handling the 'prop' parameter at the role query endpoint to determine whether input validation, parameterized queries, or SQL sanitization is implementedAffected if The 'prop' parameter accepts raw user input without sanitization or uses string concatenation in SQL queries
You are affected if you are running Alixhan xh-admin-backend version 1.7.0 or lower with the /frontend-api/system-service/api/system/role/query endpoint exposed and the 'prop' parameter lacks proper input validation or parameterized queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries or proper input validation/sanitization on the 'prop' parameter; temporarily disable the affected endpoint until a vendor patch is available.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-2663 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-2663 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data