CVE-2026-26940
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input (CWE-1284) in the Timelion visualization plugin in Kibana can lead Denial of Service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). The vulnerability allows an authenticated user to send a specially crafted Timelion expression that overwrites internal series data properties with an excessively large quantity value.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Timelion visualization plugin in Kibana fails to properly validate quantity values in user-supplied expressions, allowing authenticated users to overwrite internal series data properties with excessively large values. This causes excessive memory allocation leading to denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.0.0, < 8.19.13>= 9.0.0, < 9.2.7>= 9.3.0, < 9.3.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Kibana installation and versionRun 'kibana --version' or check the version file in the Kibana installation directory (e.g., /usr/share/kibana/package.json or the version file in the Kibana root directory)Affected if The installed version falls within >= 8.0.0 and < 8.19.13, OR >= 9.0.0 and < 9.2.7, OR >= 9.0.0 and < 9.2.7, OR >= 9.3.0 and < 9.3.2
-
Confirm Timelion plugin is enabledIn Kibana, navigate to Stack Management > Kibana > Plugins, or check kibana.yml for 'timelion.enabled: false'. By default Timelion is enabled. Verify the plugin status via the Kibana API at '/api/status' or by checking if Timelion visualizations are accessible in the Visualize tabAffected if Timelion plugin is enabled and accessible to authenticated users
-
Check for existing Timelion visualizationsSearch the Kibana .kibana index (via Dev Tools or Elasticsearch) for documents of type 'timelion-sheet' or 'visualization' with 'visState' containing 'title' references to Timelion, using: GET /.kibana/_search { "query": { "term": { "type": { "value": "timelion-sheet" } } } }Affected if Timelion visualizations exist and are available to authenticated users in the environment
You are affected if Kibana version is within the affected ranges AND the Timelion plugin is enabled and accessible to authenticated users who can create or modify Timelion expressions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.19.139.2.79.3.2
Implement strict input validation for quantity values in Timelion expressions to reject or cap excessively large values, and consider adding resource limits for query operations.
Kibana 8.19.13 for 8.x versions; Kibana 9.2.7 for 9.0-9.2.x versions; Kibana 9.3.2 for 9.3.0-9.3.1 versions
- 1. Identify your current Kibana version using Kibana'sAbout page or the/_status API
- 2. Determine the appropriate upgrade path based on your current major version (8.x or 9.x)
- 3. Review Elastic's upgrade documentation for your specific version jump at https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/current/upgrade.html
- 4. Create a backup of your Kibana configuration and saved objects
- 5. Test the upgrade in a staging environment before production deployment
- 6. Upgrade Kibana to the fixed version: 8.19.13 (for 8.x users) or 9.2.7/9.3.2 (for 9.x users)
- 7. Verify the Timelion plugin functions correctly after upgrade
- 8. Monitor Kibana logs for any errors or anomalies
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,568.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-26940 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-26940 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data