CVE-2026-27050
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThimPress RealPress realpress allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects RealPress: from n/a through <= 1.1.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThimPress RealPress plugin allows attackers to induce authenticated users to perform unintended actions by tricking them into submitting malicious requests. The vulnerability affects all versions up to and including 1.1.0 of the RealPress plugin for WordPress.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify RealPress plugin is installedNavigate to WordPress admin dashboard > Plugins and confirm RealPress by ThimPress is listed among installed pluginsAffected if RealPress plugin is present in the WordPress installation
-
Identify installed RealPress versionIn Plugins list, click on RealPress to view the version number displayed in the plugin details, or inspect the plugin header in wp-content/plugins/realpress/realpress.php for the Version: X.X.X fieldAffected if The installed version is 1.1.0 or any earlier version (all versions up to 1.1.0 are affected)
-
Inspect form handlers for nonce verificationLocate PHP files handling form submissions and AJAX requests in the plugin directory (common paths: includes/*.php, admin/*.php, or files with form-processing functions). Search for presence of wp_verify_nonce or check_admin_referer calls within those handlersAffected if Form handling code lacks nonce verification calls or uses them incorrectly (e.g., nonce is never checked, always returns true)
-
Check HTML forms for nonce fieldsView page source of any frontend or admin forms generated by RealPress (e.g., property submission forms, contact forms). Look for hidden input fields named _wpnonce or similar nonce identifiersAffected if State-changing forms (submit, update, delete actions) contain no nonce field or token parameter
The environment is affected if RealPress plugin version 1.1.0 or earlier is installed AND the plugin lacks proper nonce verification on its state-changing forms and AJAX endpoints.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens (nonces) on all state-changing operations (forms, AJAX endpoints) and verify these tokens on submission to prevent forged requests.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-27050 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-27050 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data