CVE-2026-27051
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIncorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability in uxper Golo golo allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Golo: from n/a through <= 1.7.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIncorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability in the uxper Golo framework allows unprivileged users to gain elevated privileges. The vulnerability stems from improper authorization controls that fail to properly validate or enforce user role permissions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed version of the uxper Golo frameworkLocate the framework's version file, package.json, or version metadata typically found in the application's root directory or dependencies configurationAffected if The installed version is 1.7.0 or earlier, since the fix is available in versions beyond 1.7.0
-
Review user role and permission configurationsExamine configuration files, database tables, or code that defines user roles, particularly looking for any role assignment mechanisms that may accept unvalidated inputAffected if Roles or permissions can be assigned or modified without proper administrative authorization checks
-
Inspect the authorization middleware or access control logicReview the framework's authentication and authorization code paths, specifically any logic that handles role validation or permission checks for privileged operationsAffected if The authorization logic lacks proper role validation or allows privilege escalation through missing or incomplete permission checks
-
Check for custom permission assignment endpointsAudit any API endpoints, functions, or interfaces that handle user permission assignments or role modificationsAffected if Unprivileged users can access or manipulate permission assignment functionality without proper authorization validation
You are affected if the uxper Golo framework version is 1.7.0 or earlier AND the application lacks proper role-based authorization controls, allowing unprivileged users to gain elevated privileges through permission assignment mechanisms.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a version beyond 1.7.0 if available; otherwise, implement explicit role-based access control (RBAC) checks and validate all permission assignments throughout the application.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-27051 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-27051 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data