CVE-2026-27140
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSWIG file names containing 'cgo' and well-crafted payloads could lead to code smuggling and arbitrary code execution at build time due to trust layer bypass.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a vulnerability in SWIG (Simplified Wrapper and Interface Generator) where specially crafted file names containing 'cgo' can bypass trust validation mechanisms, allowing malicious payloads to smuggle code that executes during the build process, leading to arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.25.9>= 1.26.0, < 1.26.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Go versionRun 'go version' to determine the Go toolchain versionAffected if Version is < 1.25.9 or >= 1.26.0 and < 1.26.2
-
Identify SWIG usage in build processSearch for .i SWIG interface files or usage of SWIG in build scripts, Makefiles, or CI/CD pipelinesAffected if SWIG is being used to generate code bindings
-
Locate files with 'cgo' in filenameSearch the project directory for files containing 'cgo' in their name (e.g., find . -name '*cgo*'), particularly .i or .swig filesAffected if SWIG interface or input files with 'cgo' in the filename exist and are processed during build
-
Inspect build configuration for SWIG executionReview build logs, scripts, or toolchain configuration to confirm SWIG is invoked during compilationAffected if SWIG is executed as part of the build pipeline to process cgo-related input files
You are affected if your Go version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND you use SWIG to process files with 'cgo' in the filename during build time.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.25.91.26.2
Users should restrict processing of untrusted SWIG interface files and monitor for updates/patches from the SWIG project; avoid using SWIG with files from untrusted sources until patched.
Go 1.26.2 or later (or Go 1.25.9+ if staying on 1.25.x line)
- 1. Identify the current Go version by running: go version
- 2. If using Go < 1.25.9, upgrade to at least Go 1.25.9 or later in the 1.25.x line
- 3. If using Go >= 1.26.0 and < 1.26.2, upgrade to at least Go 1.26.2 or the latest 1.26.x release
- 4. Download the updated Go version from https://go.dev/dl/
- 5. Verify the upgrade by running: go version
- 6. Rebuild and test any projects that use SWIG interfaces to ensure the fix is applied
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,920.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-27140 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- pkg.go.dev
- go.dev
- groups.google.com
- go.dev
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- security.access.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-27140 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data