CVE-2026-27172
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe ConsulRegistry in the camel-consul component (class org.apache.camel.component.consul.ConsulRegistry and its inner ConsulRegistryUtils.deserialize method) read Java-serialized values from the Consul KV store and passed them to ObjectInputStream.readObject() without configuring an ObjectInputFilter. An attacker who can write to the Consul KV store backing a Camel ConsulRegistry instance could inject a malicious serialized Java object that is deserialized the next time Camel performs a lookup against that registry, leading to arbitrary code execution in the Camel process. The issue mirrors the class of vulnerability already addressed for other Camel components in CVE-2024-22369, CVE-2024-23114 and CVE-2026-25747, and was overlooked during the original remediation of those CVEs. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 3.0.0 before 4.14.6, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.19.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.6. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe ConsulRegistry in Apache Camel's camel-consul component reads Java-serialized values from the Consul KV store and deserializes them via ObjectInputStream.readObject() without an ObjectInputFilter. An attacker with write access to the Consul KV store can inject malicious serialized objects that execute arbitrary code upon Camel registry lookup.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 3.0.0, < 4.14.6>= 4.15.0, < 4.18.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache Camel versionLocate the camel-core JAR file or check your build file (pom.xml, gradle.build) for the Apache Camel version. Run 'mvn dependency:tree | grep camel-core' or inspect the classpath for 'camel-core-*.jar'.Affected if The version is >= 3.0.0 and < 4.14.6, or >= 4.15.0 and < 4.18.1
-
Confirm camel-consul component is presentCheck your build dependencies for 'camel-consul' or search your codebase for imports of 'org.apache.camel.component.consul' packages. Inspect your classpath for 'camel-consul-*.jar'.Affected if The camel-consul component is on the classpath or referenced in your Camel routes or configuration.
-
Verify ConsulRegistry is in useSearch your Java/XML configuration files for 'ConsulRegistry' bean definitions or look for 'registry:consul' in your Camel route definitions. Check application context files for ConsulRegistry instantiation.Affected if ConsulRegistry is configured as the Camel registry, enabling the KV store deserialization path.
You are affected if your Apache Camel version falls within the vulnerable range AND you are using the camel-consul component with ConsulRegistry enabled, allowing deserialization of objects from the Consul KV store.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.14.64.18.1
Upgrade Apache Camel to version 4.19.0, 4.14.6 (LTS), or 4.18.1. If upgrade is not immediately possible, restrict write access to the Consul KV store to trusted parties only.
4.14.6 (for 4.14.x LTS), 4.18.1 (for 4.18.x), or 4.19.0+ (for other affected versions)
- 1. Identify the current Apache Camel version in use by checking project dependencies or the camel-core JAR manifest
- 2. Determine which release stream is in use: 3.x, 4.14.x LTS, or 4.18.x
- 3. For 4.14.x LTS stream: upgrade to version 4.14.6
- 4. For 4.18.x stream: upgrade to version 4.18.1
- 5. For all other affected versions: upgrade to version 4.19.0 or later
- 6. Update the Maven pom.xml or build configuration to use the new Camel version
- 7. Rebuild and redeploy the application
- 8. Verify that the camel-consul component loads correctly and lookups function as expected
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-27172 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-27172 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data