CVE-2026-27224
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier contain a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability where malicious JavaScript can be injected into form fields. The payload persists in the system and executes when users view pages containing the compromised fields.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.24.0< 2026.2.0= 6.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Adobe Experience Manager installed versionNavigate to the AEM Welcome page or access /system/console/bundles.json, or run: curl -s http://localhost:4502/crx/packmgr/service.jsp?cmd=ls 2>/dev/null | grep -i 'version' . Alternatively, check the product.info in the OSGi console at /system/console/product.jsonAffected if The installed version is lower than 6.5.24.0, lower than 2026.2.0, or exactly 6.5
-
Identify form field configurationsReview form components in AEM Content Fragments or Adaptive Forms at /libs/fd/af/authoring/components and custom form configurations under /apps. Check for form field definitions in XML (.xml) or .form.js filesAffected if Custom form fields or Adaptive Forms are configured with user input capabilities and no output encoding is applied
-
Inspect stored form data for malicious scriptsQuery the AEM repository (CRX/DE) at /content or use Query Builder to search for stored form submissions: curl -s -u admin:admin 'http://localhost:4502/bin/querybuilder.json?path=/content&type=nt:unstructured&property=jcr:content/*' | grep -i '<script\|javascript:' or examine form data in the MongoDB or RDB datastore if external storage is usedAffected if Any form submissions contain persisted script tags, javascript: URIs, or event handler attributes like onload/onerror
-
Verify form input validation settingsCheck form field validation rules in the AEM Forms UI at /aem/forms/editor/content/editor.html or inspect the validation model in the form definition JSON at /conf/<project>/settings/wcm/template-types/adaptive-templateAffected if Form fields lack server-side validation or XSS protection rules are disabled/missing
You are affected if AEM version is below 6.5.24.0 or below 2026.2.0 AND your AEM deployment uses form fields that accept and store user input without XSS protection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.24.02026.2.0
Update Adobe Experience Manager to a version newer than 6.5.23. Additionally, implement proper input validation and output encoding on form fields to prevent XSS attacks.
6.5.24.0 or later (or 2026.2.0+)
- 1. Back up your current Adobe Experience Manager instance and content repository
- 2. Review the Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.24.0 or 2026.2.0+ release notes for any migration requirements
- 3. Stop the AEM instance
- 4. Apply the upgrade following Adobe's standard upgrade procedure for your deployment type
- 5. After upgrade, verify that all custom code and integrations still function correctly
- 6. Test the specific form fields that were previously vulnerable to ensure the XSS fix is working
- 7. Restart the AEM instance and monitor for any errors
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-27224 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-27224 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data