CVE-2026-27252
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier allows low-privileged users to inject malicious JavaScript into form fields. The injected script persists in the system and executes in victim browsers when they navigate to pages containing the compromised fields.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.24< 2026.2.0= 6.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check your AEM versionNavigate to the AEM Welcome page or check the com.adobe.version file in the crx-quickstart folder. You can also query the system console at /system/console/status-productinfo to retrieve the exact installed version.Affected if The installed version is 6.5.23 or earlier, 6.5 (any patch level), or any version below 2026.2.0.
-
Identify form components in useReview your AEM instance for form components under /libs/foundation/components/form or custom form implementations. Check the content structure under /content for pages containing form fields.Affected if Form components that accept user input are present and accessible on the instance.
-
Audit low-privilege user permissionsOpen the User Administration console at /useradmin. Review user groups assigned 'content-author' or similar low-privilege roles. Verify which users can create or edit form content under /content.Affected if Low-privilege users (non-admin) have permission to create, edit, or modify form field content.
-
Inspect form field data for malicious contentUse CRXDE Lite (accessible at /crx/de) or the Query tool to search form content nodes under /content. Look for stored scripts in form field values (check for <script> tags, javascript: URIs, or event handlers like onload, onerror).Affected if Any form field values contain unsanitized script tags or JavaScript event handlers.
Your environment is affected if you run AEM version 6.5.23 or earlier (or < 2026.2.0), have form components in use, allow low-privilege users to edit form fields, and especially if malicious script content is already present in form data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.242026.2.0
Apply Adobe's security patch for this vulnerability (upgrade to AEM 6.5.24 or later). Until then, implement strict input validation and output encoding on all form fields, and consider restricting low-privilege user permissions to form creation/editing.
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.24 or later / 2026.2.0+
- 1. Identify the current Adobe Experience Manager version by checking the system console or AEM version file
- 2. Plan the upgrade during a maintenance window following Adobe's upgrade documentation
- 3. Back up the current AEM instance including repository, database, and configurations
- 4. Upgrade Adobe Experience Manager to version 6.5.24 or later (or to 2026.2.0+ if using the newer release cadence)
- 5. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the AEM version in the system console
- 6. Test the fix by attempting to inject script tags into vulnerable form fields to confirm XSS is no longer possible
- 7. Clear AEM caches and publish any content changes if necessary
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-27252 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-27252 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data