CVE-2026-27288
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.24, FP11.7 and earlier are affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceDOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.24, FP11.7 and earlier. Attackers can manipulate the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the victim's browser context.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 6.5.24.0< 6.5.11.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Adobe Experience Manager versionCheck the product version in the AEM Welcome page (help > Version Information) or via the system console (system/console/bundles), or inspect the JAR file properties in the crx-quickstart folderAffected if The installed AEM version is 6.5.24.0 or earlier (including all 6.5.x versions prior to 6.5.24) or FP11.7 or earlier for the feature pack version
-
Verify Adobe Experience Manager Screens versionCheck the AEM Screens package version via the system console (system/console/bundles) or look for screens-core JAR in the install folderAffected if The installed AEM Screens version is lower than 6.5.11.8
-
Identify DOM-handling componentsReview custom components, client-side libraries, or third-party integrations that manipulate the DOM using user-supplied input, particularly in cq:editConfig or cq:design_dialog configurationsAffected if Custom components accept unsanitized user input and inject it directly into the DOM without proper encoding or validation
-
Check for exposed content editing interfacesAudit the publishing instance endpoints and any publicly accessible Editable Templates, Experience Fragments, or Content Services that accept user input and render it client-sideAffected if Anonymous or low-privilege users can submit content that gets rendered in the browser without server-side output encoding
-
Review Content Security Policy configurationInspect the Apache Sling main servlet or dispatcher configuration for CSP header rules, looking for 'unsafe-inline' or overly permissive script-src directivesAffected if CSP headers are missing, not enforced, or contain 'unsafe-inline' which would allow the XSS to execute in victim browsers
A user is affected if their AEM version is 6.5.24.0 or earlier (or AEM Screens below 6.5.11.8) AND the environment contains components or endpoints that render user input directly into the browser DOM without sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.11.8
Upgrade Adobe Experience Manager to a patched version beyond 6.5.24/FP11.7 and implement Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to mitigate client-side XSS execution.
AEM 6.5.24.1+ or AEM Screens 6.5.11.8+
- 1. Identify the current Adobe Experience Manager version in your deployment using the AEM Web Console or version information.
- 2. For Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) 6.5.x: Upgrade to version 6.5.24.1 or later, which contains the security patch for this DOM-based XSS vulnerability.
- 3. For Adobe Experience Manager Screens: Upgrade to version 6.5.11.8 or later.
- 4. After upgrading, verify the AEM instance is running correctly by accessing the Welcome page and checking for any error messages.
- 5. Test critical workflows in your AEM environment to ensure functionality is preserved after the upgrade.
- 6. Clear browser caches and test to confirm the XSS fix is applied and no new vulnerabilities are introduced.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-27288 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-27288 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data