CVE-2026-27433
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnauthenticated Broken Access Control in Motors <= 5.6.80 versions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceUnauthenticated broken access control vulnerability in the Motors WordPress theme/plugin (versions <= 5.6.80) allows attackers to access sensitive functionality or data without any authentication credentials due to improper authorization checks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Motors theme or plugin is installedLog into the WordPress admin dashboard and navigate to Appearance > Themes (for theme) or Plugins (for plugin) to confirm Motors is presentAffected if Motors theme or plugin is not installed in WordPress
-
Locate the installed version numberIn WordPress admin, go to Themes or Plugins page and find the Motors entry to view its version number, or check the main PHP file (typically functions.php or main plugin file) for the 'Version' header commentAffected if The displayed version number is 5.6.80 or lower
-
Confirm the version is within affected rangeCompare your installed version against the vulnerable range: any version <= 5.6.80 is affectedAffected if The installed version is 5.6.80 or any lower number
-
Check for exposed admin or sensitive endpointsIf accessible without authentication, attempt to access common WordPress admin paths (such as /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php with Motors-specific actions, or any custom Motors endpoints) to verify if authorization is enforced; review Motors plugin/theme files for function hooks that handle sensitive operationsAffected if Sensitive functionality or data is accessible without requiring login credentials
You are affected if the Motors WordPress theme or plugin is installed and its version is 5.6.80 or lower, and unauthenticated access to sensitive functionality is possible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Motors to a version newer than 5.6.80 or apply the vendor's security patch to remediate the broken access control.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-27433 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-27433 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data