CVE-2026-27474
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSPIP before 4.4.9 allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in the private area, complementing an incomplete fix from SPIP 4.4.8. The echappe_anti_xss() function was not systematically applied to input, form, button, and anchor (a) HTML tags, allowing an attacker to inject malicious scripts through these elements. This vulnerability is not mitigated by the SPIP security screen.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSPIP before version 4.4.9 contains a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the private area. The echappe_anti_xss() sanitization function was not consistently applied to input, form, button, and anchor HTML tags, allowing attackers to inject malicious JavaScript through these elements. The SPIP security screen does not mitigate this issue.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.4.0, < 4.4.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine SPIP versionAccess the private area login page or check the includes/spip_version.php file to identify the installed SPIP version numberAffected if The version is 4.4.0 through 4.4.8 inclusive (versions 4.4.x below 4.4.9)
-
Confirm private area accessVerify that the private area (administration interface) is enabled and accessible on the SPIP installationAffected if The private area is enabled and users can submit content through forms in that area
-
Review echappe_anti_xss functionInspect the inc/filtres_echapper/php or similar sanitization files to verify if echappe_anti_xss() is applied to input, form, button, and anchor tags in the codeAffected if The function is missing or inconsistently applied to those four HTML tag types
-
Audit user-submitted contentExamine the database tables containing content submitted through the private area (articles, forum posts, etc.) for any suspicious script tags or event handlers in HTML elementsAffected if Malicious JavaScript code is found embedded in input, form, button, or anchor elements within private area content
The environment is affected if SPIP version 4.4.0 through 4.4.8 is running, the private area is accessible, and the echappe_anti_xss() function does not cover all four vulnerable HTML tag types.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.4.9
Upgrade to SPIP 4.4.9 or later, which applies echappe_anti_xss() systematically to all vulnerable HTML tag types. Review user-submitted content in the private area for any existing malicious script injections.
SPIP 4.4.9
- 1. Back up your existing SPIP installation including the database and all files
- 2. Download SPIP 4.4.9 from the official SPIP website (https://www.spip.net/)
- 3. Extract the new version files
- 4. Replace the core files on your server with the new version, preserving your local/config/ directory and any custom plugins
- 5. Run any database migration scripts if prompted during the upgrade process
- 6. Clear the SPIP cache by deleting the tmp/cache/ directory contents
- 7. Verify the installation by logging into the private area
- 8. Test that the XSS fix is working by checking that the echappe_anti_xss() function properly escapes input, form, button, and anchor tags
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,952.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-27474 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-27474 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data