CVE-2026-27623
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedValkey is a distributed key-value database. Starting in version 9.0.0 and prior to version 9.0.3, a malicious actor with network access to Valkey can cause the system to abort by triggering an assertion. When processing incoming requests, the Valkey system does not properly reset the networking state after processing an empty request. A malicious actor can then send a request that the server incorrectly identifies as breaking server side invariants, which results in the server shutting down. Version 9.0.3 fixes the issue. As an additional mitigation, properly isolate Valkey deployments so that only trusted users have access.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn Valkey versions 9.0.0 through 9.0.2, the networking state is not properly reset after processing an empty request. An attacker with network access can send specially crafted requests that the server misinterprets as invariant violations, triggering an assertion failure that causes the server to abort and shut down.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 9.0.0, < 9.0.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed Valkey versionRun `valkey-server --version` or `valkey-cli --version` to retrieve the version stringAffected if The version shown is 9.0.0, 9.0.1, or 9.0.2 (falling within >= 9.0.0 and < 9.0.3)
-
Check network binding configurationExamine the Valkey configuration file (valkey.conf) for the `bind` directive, or run `valkey-cli CONFIG GET bind` to see which network interfaces the server listens onAffected if The bind address allows connections from untrusted network segments (e.g., 0.0.0.0 or publicly routable IPs rather than localhost or trusted internal networks)
-
Verify server is running and accepting connectionsRun `valkey-cli PING` to confirm the server is active and accessible over the networkAffected if The server responds to commands, meaning it is actively processing network requests and could receive the malicious crafted empty requests
You are affected if you are running Valkey version 9.0.0, 9.0.1, or 9.0.3 and the server is accessible over a network where untrusted users can send requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.0.3
Upgrade Valkey to version 9.0.3 or later. Additionally, restrict network access to Valkey instances so only trusted users can connect.
Valkey 9.0.3 or later
- 1. Identify the current running Valkey version using 'valkey-cli INFO server' or 'valkey-server --version'
- 2. Create a full backup of Valkey data and configuration files before upgrading
- 3. Stop the Valkey service gracefully using 'systemctl stop valkey' or 'valkey-cli SHUTDOWN'
- 4. Upgrade Valkey to version 9.0.3 or later using the package manager (e.g., 'apt-get update && apt-get install valkey' or 'yum update valkey')
- 5. Verify the upgraded version with 'valkey-server --version' to confirm 9.0.3 or higher is installed
- 6. Start the Valkey service using 'systemctl start valkey'
- 7. Test that the server is operational with 'valkey-cli PING'
- 8. As an additional mitigation, ensure Valkey deployments are network-isolated so only trusted users have access (e.g., firewall rules, bind to localhost, or VPN)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,392.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-27623 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-27623 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data