CVE-2026-27653
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe installers for multiple products provided by Soliton Systems K.K. contain an issue with incorrect default permissions, which may allow arbitrary code to be executed with SYSTEM privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe installers for Soliton Systems K.K. products create files or directories with overly permissive default permissions (likely world-writable or with weak ACLs), allowing a local unprivileged attacker to modify executable files or DLLs and achieve arbitrary code execution with SYSTEM privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0.0>= 2.0.0, < 2.0.15>= 1.0.0, < 1.4.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Soliton product installationsCheck the Windows registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall for entries containing 'Soliton Securebrowser' or 'Soliton Secureworkspace', or look in common installation paths like C:\Program Files\Soliton or C:\Program Files (x86)\SolitonAffected if Any Soliton Securebrowser for Onegate, Securebrowser Ii, or Secureworkspace entry is found in the registry or filesystem
-
Determine installed versionFor each Soliton product found, read the DisplayVersion value from the registry uninstall key, or check the version info of the main executable (typically securebrowser.exe, securebrowser_ii.exe, or secureworkspace.exe) in the installation directoryAffected if The version is 1.0.0 for Securebrowser For Onegate, between 2.0.0 and 2.0.14 for Securebrowser Ii, or between 1.0.0 and 1.4.7 for Secureworkspace
-
Check installation directory permissionsRight-click the main installation folder (e.g., C:\Program Files\Soliton\Securebrowser or Secureworkspace), select Properties, go to the Security tab, and examine which users or groups have Write or Modify permissionsAffected if Users other than Administrators or SYSTEM have Write or Modify access to the installation directory containing executable files or DLLs
-
Verify executable file permissionsRight-click the main executable files (.exe and .dll files) in the Soliton installation folder, select Properties, Security, and check if non-admin users have Write permissionAffected if Non-privileged users have Write permission on executable files or DLLs in the Soliton installation directory
A user is affected if any Soliton Securebrowser or Secureworkspace product is installed with a vulnerable version AND non-administrative users have Write access to the installation directory or its executable files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.4.82.0.15
Identify all installed files from affected Soliton products and correct file permissions to follow least-privilege principles—remove write access for non-admin users on executable directories and re-install products with secure permission configurations if needed.
Securebrowser II: 2.0.15; Secureworkspace: 1.4.8; Securebrowser For Onegate: any version > 1.0.0
- 1. Identify which Soliton product(s) are deployed in your environment: Securebrowser For Onegate, Securebrowser II, or Secureworkspace
- 2. For Securebrowser For Onegate: Upgrade from version 1.0.0 to a newer version (any version after 1.0.0 contains the fix)
- 3. For Securebrowser II: Upgrade from any version >= 2.0.0 and < 2.0.15 to version 2.0.15 or later
- 4. For Secureworkspace: Upgrade from any version >= 1.0.0 and < 1.4.8 to version 1.4.8 or later
- 5. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the product version
- 6. Re-run the installer or reinstall the product to ensure correct file permissions are applied
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-27653 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-27653 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data