CVE-2026-27699
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe `basic-ftp` FTP client library for Node.js contains a path traversal vulnerability (CWE-22) in versions prior to 5.2.0 in the `downloadToDir()` method. A malicious FTP server can send directory listings with filenames containing path traversal sequences (`../`) that cause files to be written outside the intended download directory. Version 5.2.0 patches the issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe basic-ftp library for Node.js versions prior to 5.2.0 contain a path traversal vulnerability (CWE-22) in the downloadToDir() method. A malicious or compromised FTP server can send directory listings containing '../' sequences in filenames, causing the client to write files outside the intended download directory, potentially overwriting system files or exposing sensitive data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 5.2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if basic-ftp is installedCheck your project's package.json file under dependencies or devDependencies for 'basic-ftp' or examine node_modules for the basic-ftp package directoryAffected if The package is listed in dependencies and was installed (check node_modules/basic-ftp/package.json for version)
-
Determine the installed versionRun 'npm list basic-ftp' or inspect node_modules/basic-ftp/package.json to read the 'version' fieldAffected if The version number is less than 5.2.0 (e.g., 5.1.0, 5.0.0, etc.)
-
Check for usage of downloadToDir methodSearch your codebase for calls to downloadToDir (e.g., grep -r 'downloadToDir' or search in your IDE)Affected if Your code calls the downloadToDir method to download files from FTP servers
-
Verify download directory configurationReview the directory path passed as the first argument to downloadToDir in your codeAffected if The method is used with a download directory path (this is required for the vulnerability to be exploitable)
-
Inspect application logs for path anomaliesSearch server or application logs for file paths containing '../' or '..\' patterns in download operationsAffected if Logs show file writes occurring outside the intended download directory (evidence of exploitation)
You are affected if basic-ftp version less than 5.2.0 is installed AND your application uses the downloadToDir method to fetch files from FTP servers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.2.0
Upgrade the basic-ftp package to version 5.2.0 or later to apply the patch that addresses this path traversal vulnerability.
basic-ftp version 5.2.0 or higher
- 1. Identify all projects that depend on the `basic-ftp` package by checking package.json files or lock files
- 2. Run `npm list basic-ftp` or `yarn list basic-ftp` in each project to check the currently installed version
- 3. If the installed version is below 5.2.0, upgrade by running `npm install basic-ftp@^5.2.0` or `yarn add basic-ftp@^5.2.0`
- 4. Verify the upgrade was successful by running the package manager list command again
- 5. Run your project's test suite to ensure the upgrade does not break existing functionality
- 6. Rebuild and redeploy any applications using this library
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-27699 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-27699 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data