CVE-2026-27750
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAvira Internet Security contains a time-of-check time-of-use (TOCTOU) vulnerability in the Optimizer component. A privileged service running as SYSTEM identifies directories for cleanup during a scan phase and subsequently deletes them during a separate cleanup phase without revalidating the target path. A local attacker can replace a previously scanned directory with a junction or reparse point before deletion occurs, causing the privileged process to delete an unintended system location. This may result in deletion of protected files or directories and can lead to local privilege escalation, denial of service, or system integrity compromise depending on the affected target.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAvira Internet Security Optimizer has a TOCTOU vulnerability where a privileged SYSTEM service scans for directories to clean, then later deletes them without revalidating the path. A local attacker can replace a scanned directory with a junction/reparse point before the cleanup phase, causing the privileged process to delete unintended system locations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.1.114.3113CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Avira Internet Security installationCheck for Avira Internet Security in Programs and Features or list installed programs via registry: HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\{ProductCode} or check C:\Program Files\Avira directoryAffected if Avira Internet Security is installed on the system
-
Determine installed version of Avira Internet SecurityOpen Avira client, go to Help > About, or check registry key HKLM\SOFTWARE\Avira\Setup\Instance1\Version to retrieve the exact version numberAffected if The installed version is lower than 1.1.114.3113
-
Confirm Optimizer component is presentCheck for Avira Optimizer executable at C:\Program Files\Avira\Optimizer or look for Avira.Optimizer.Service.exe in task manager servicesAffected if The Optimizer service component is present on the system
-
Verify SYSTEM-level privilege of Avira servicesOpen Services.msc, locate Avira services, right-click and check Properties > Log On tab, or run 'sc queryex' for Avira services to confirm they run under the LocalSystem accountAffected if Avira Optimizer service runs under the LocalSystem (SYSTEM) account
You are affected if Avira Internet Security with version lower than 1.1.114.3113 is installed and the Optimizer component, running with SYSTEM privileges, is present on your system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.1.114.3113
Implement atomic path validation and revalidation immediately before deletion operations to verify the target path has not been modified. Use Windows APIs that atomically resolve junction points and validate paths within the same transaction as deletion.
1.1.114.3113 or later
- 1. Open the Avira Internet Security application on the affected system
- 2. Navigate to the settings or help section of the application
- 3. Check the current installed version under 'About' or 'Version Information'
- 4. If the version is below 1.1.114.3113, initiate an update check or navigate to the update settings
- 5. Download and install the latest version (1.1.114.3113 or later) from the official Avira download page at www.avira.com
- 6. Alternatively, use the built-in update mechanism: Help > Check for Updates
- 7. After installation, verify the version number matches 1.1.114.3113 or higher
- 8. Restart the system to ensure all optimizer components are properly loaded
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-27750 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-27750 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data