CVE-2026-27753
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSODOLA SL902-SWTGW124AS firmware versions through 200.1.20 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows remote attackers to perform unlimited login attempts against the management interface. Attackers can conduct online password guessing attacks without account lockout or rate limiting restrictions to gain unauthorized access to the device management interface.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe SODOLA SL902-SWTGW124AS wireless gateway firmware through version 200.1.20 lacks account lockout and rate limiting controls on its management interface authentication, allowing remote attackers to conduct unlimited login attempts without triggering any lockout or delay.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 200.1.20CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device model is the affected productAccess the device management interface or check the device label/sticker to verify the model is SL902-SWTGW124ASAffected if Device model is Sodola Network Sl902 Swtgw124as
-
Check firmware versionLog into the management interface and navigate to the Status, System Info, or About page to display the firmware version. Compare it to the affected range: <= 200.1.20Affected if Firmware version is 200.1.20 or lower
-
Verify account lockout is not enforcedAttempt to authenticate with invalid credentials multiple times (5-10+ attempts) using a script or manual entry. Observe whether the account becomes locked, disabled, or flagged after failed attemptsAffected if No account lockout occurs after multiple failed login attempts
-
Verify rate limiting is not enforcedSend multiple rapid authentication requests to the login endpoint. Measure if any deliberate delay, throttle, or timeout is imposed between failed attemptsAffected if No delay, throttling, or timeout occurs between rapid failed login attempts
If the device is a SODOLA SL902-SWTGW124AS running firmware version 200.1.20 or lower and its login page allows unlimited rapid authentication attempts without any lockout or delay, the environment is affected.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement account lockout after a configurable number of failed attempts and add progressive rate limiting (delays between attempts) to the login function; if the vendor does not provide a patched firmware, restrict management interface access to trusted networks via firewall rules.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-27753 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-27753 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data