CVE-2026-27777
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCharging station authentication identifiers are publicly accessible via web-based mapping platforms.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceEV charging station authentication identifiers (credentials, tokens, or keys) are being exposed publicly through web-based mapping platforms (likely embedded in location data or business listings), allowing unauthorized parties to discover and potentially use these credentials to access charging station systems.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Search mapping platforms for your station locationsSearch Google Maps, Apple Maps, and OpenStreetMap for your EV charging station business listings. Review the business name, description, and any embedded data fields for authentication identifiers, tokens, or API keys.Affected if Your station listing or location data contains visible credentials, tokens, or keys in public fields.
-
Inspect station metadata and custom data fieldsCheck if your charging station entries on mapping platforms include custom fields, check-in notes, or embedded URLs that may contain authentication parameters or credentials.Affected if Metadata fields contain authentication identifiers or credential data accessible to the public.
-
Search public data repositories for your station identifiersSearch public data dumps, breach databases, and OSINT resources for your charging station identifiers, business names, or known station IDs to see if credentials have been leaked.Affected if Your authentication tokens, keys, or credentials appear in any public data repositories or breach databases.
-
Review third-party integrations with mapping servicesIdentify any third-party services or apps that integrate your station data with mapping platforms. Audit what data these integrations transmit, including any authentication credentials that may be inadvertently included.Affected if Third-party integrations or data feeds are exposing authentication identifiers to mapping platforms.
You are affected if authentication identifiers for your EV charging stations are discoverable in any public mapping platform data, business listings, or third-party data feeds integrated with mapping services.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRemove all authentication identifiers from publicly accessible mapping platform data, rotate any exposed credentials immediately, and implement proper data sanitization controls to prevent sensitive information from being published to third-party mapping services.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-27777 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-27777 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data