CVE-2026-27813
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedEVerest is an EV charging software stack. Versions prior to 2026.02.0 have a data race leading to use-after-free. This is triggered by EV plug-in/unplug and RFID/RemoteStart/OCPP authorization events (or delayed authorization response). Version 2026.2.0 contains a patch.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceEVerest versions before 2026.02.0 contain a data race condition that leads to use-after-free. The race occurs when EV plug-in/unplug events and authorization events (RFID, RemoteStart, OCPP, or delayed authorization responses) execute concurrently without proper synchronization, causing a memory safety violation when one thread frees a resource while another still references it.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2026.02.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Physical
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed EVerest versionRun 'everest --version' or check the version reported by the main everest-core process. Alternatively, inspect the package metadata if installed via package manager.Affected if The version is before 2026.02.0 (e.g., 2025.x, 2024.x, or any nightly build earlier than the release date).
-
Check if authorization modules are activeReview the EVerest configuration file (usually in /etc/everest or the deployment's config directory) for entries under 'authorization' that enable RFID, RemoteStart, OCPP, or delayed authorization.Affected if One or more of these authorization modules are configured and actively processing requests while the system is running.
-
Verify charging sessions occur with plug/unplug eventsMonitor the system for电动汽车 (EV) charging sessions. Check if the system logs or status shows any plug-in/unplug events occurring during active authorization processing.Affected if Charging sessions with physical plug/unplug events have occurred or are expected to occur while authorization is in progress.
-
Review logs for race condition symptomsSearch EVerest logs (typically in /var/log/everest/ or stdout from the everest-core service) for indicators of memory safety issues: use-after-free errors, segmentation faults, or unexpected crashes during concurrent plug/unplug and authorization events.Affected if Logs contain crashes, memory errors, or race condition warnings occurring during concurrent authorization and plug/unplug operations.
You are affected if your EVerest version is before 2026.02.0 AND you use any authorization method (RFID, RemoteStart, OCPP, or delayed authorization) while handling EV plug/unplug events in a running system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2026.02.0
Upgrade to EVerest version 2026.2.0 or later, which contains the patch addressing the synchronization issue between authorization and plug/unplug state transitions.
2026.02.0
- Identify the current EVerest version in use by checking the installed package or build configuration
- Review the EVerest release notes for version 2026.02.0 to understand the fix for the use-after-free vulnerability
- Plan the upgrade ensuring compatibility with your existing system dependencies
- Test the upgrade in a non-production environment to verify the data race issue is resolved
- Deploy version 2026.02.0 or later to the production environment
- Monitor the system after upgrade for any authorization-related issues or crashes
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,568.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-27813 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-27813 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data