Missing AuthenticationWeakness · CWE-306

CVE-2026-27846

MEDIUM · 6.2 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-02-25
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
67/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Due to missing authentication, a user with physical access to the device can misuse the mesh functionality for adding a new mesh device to the network  to gain access to sensitive information, including the password for admin access to the web interface and the Wi-Fi passwords.This issue affects MR9600: 1.0.4.205530; MX4200: 1.0.13.210200.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is an authentication bypass vulnerability in the mesh device pairing functionality of specific router models. A physically proximate attacker can exploit the lack of authentication during mesh device addition to inject a rogue mesh node, which then exposes stored credentials including the administrator web interface password and Wi-Fi network keys.

MitigationApply vendor firmware updates when released. Until then, restrict physical access to the router and monitor for unauthorized mesh device associations. Consider disabling mesh functionality if not required.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify router model and firmware version
    Access the router's web administration interface or check the device label/specified admin page to determine the exact model number and current firmware version.
    Affected if The model and version fall within the vendor's affected product list but specific ranges are not provided in this CVE data.
  2. Verify mesh functionality status
    Log into the router administration panel and navigate to the mesh or wireless settings section. Look for options labeled 'mesh', 'mesh network', 'EasyMesh', or 'Wi-Fi Easy Mesh' and check whether they are enabled.
    Affected if Mesh functionality is turned ON - the vulnerability only applies when mesh pairing is active.
  3. Inspect connected mesh nodes
    In the router's admin interface, locate the device list, mesh node list, or client table. Enumerate all mesh nodes or range extenders currently associated with the network.
    Affected if Any unknown, unrecognized, or suspiciously named mesh nodes are present in the list.
  4. Review device association logs
    Check the router's system logs, event logs, or security logs for any recent 'mesh node added', 'device connected', or 'pairing' events, especially those occurring without admin notification or at unexpected times.
    Affected if Log entries indicate mesh devices were added without your explicit authorization.
  5. Examine admin password and Wi-Fi credential exposure
    If a rogue mesh node is suspected, check whether the administrator web interface password or Wi-Fi network keys have been changed or are no longer functional, or if new wireless networks have appeared.
    Affected if Credentials have changed unexpectedly or unauthorized wireless networks are now visible.

A user is affected if they use an affected router model/version with mesh functionality enabled and either detect unauthorized mesh nodes or discover compromised credentials.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor firmware updates when released. Until then, restrict physical access to the router and monitor for unauthorized mesh device associations. Consider disabling mesh functionality if not required.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
25.0 hours of engineering $4,400
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-27846 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-27846 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data