CVE-2026-27851
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWhen safe filter is used with variable expansion, all following pipelines on the same string are incorrectly interpreted as safe too, enabling unsafe data to be unescaped. This can enable SQL / LDAP injection attacks when used in authentication. Avoid using safe filter until on fixed version. No publicly available exploits are known.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA vulnerability in template rendering allows the 'safe' filter (which marks content as exempt from escaping) to incorrectly propagate its 'safe' status to all subsequent pipelines on the same string. When combined with variable expansion, this causes unsanitized user input to be unescaped, enabling SQL or LDAP injection when the affected output is used in authentication contexts.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.4.4< 3.1.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Dovecot versionRun 'dovecot --version' or check package manager (rpm -q dovecot, dpkg -l dovecot)Affected if Version is below 2.4.4 for Dovecot or below 3.1.5 for Open Xchange Dovecot
-
Locate template configuration filesSearch for template files in /etc/dovecot, /usr/share/dovecot, or custom template directories; look for .tpl, .template, or Sieve script filesAffected if Templates exist and are used for user-facing content or authentication
-
Identify safe filter usage in templatesGrep for '|safe' or 'safe_filter' within template files found in the systemAffected if Templates contain the 'safe' filter applied to variables
-
Check for variable expansion in authentication contextsReview template content for variables ({{var}} or similar) used in authentication flows, password templates, or login screens; grep for 'safe' near auth-related keywordsAffected if The safe filter is applied to variables that could contain user input in authentication-related templates
-
Audit SQL/LDAP query constructionSearch configuration for SQL or LDAP query patterns in authentication modules; check if templates feed into query parameters without parameterizationAffected if User-controllable data from templates flows into SQL or LDAP queries without proper sanitization
You are affected if running a vulnerable Dovecot version AND templates with the 'safe' filter are used in authentication or query contexts where user input flows through.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.4.43.1.5
Avoid using the safe filter in templates until a patched version is available. Audit existing templates for safe filter usage with variable expansion, particularly in authentication-related code paths.
Dovecot 2.4.4 (for 2.x branch) or Dovecot 3.1.5 (for 3.x branch) or later
- Check the current installed Dovecot version using: dovecot --version
- Identify which major version branch is in use (2.x or 3.x)
- For Debian/Ubuntu: Update package lists and upgrade: apt update && apt install --only-upgrade dovecot-core
- For RHEL/CentOS: yum update dovecot or dnf update dovecot
- For RHEL 8/9: Verify available fixed version in repositories: dnf info dovecot
- After upgrade, verify the new version is installed: dovecot --version
- Restart Dovecot service: systemctl restart dovecot (or service dovecot restart)
- If using safe filter with variable expansion in configuration, review and test authentication workflows after upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-27851 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-27851 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data