CVE-2026-27887
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSpin is an open source developer tool for building and running serverless applications powered by WebAssembly. When Spin is configured to allow connections to a database or web server which could return responses of unbounded size (e.g. tables with many rows or large content bodies), Spin may in some cases attempt to buffer the entire response before delivering it to the guest, which can lead to the host process running out of memory, panicking, and crashing. In addition, a malicious guest application could incrementally insert a large number of rows or values into a database and then retrieve them all in a single query, leading to large host allocations. Spin 3.6.1, SpinKube 0.6.2, and `containerd-shim-spin` 0.22.1 have been patched to address the issue. As a workaround, configure Spin to only allow access to trusted databases and HTTP servers which limit response sizes.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSpin, a serverless WebAssembly tool, fails to limit response sizes when connecting to databases or HTTP servers. The host buffers entire responses in memory before delivering them to guest applications, causing memory exhaustion, panic, and crash. Additionally, a malicious guest can trigger large allocations by inserting many rows and retrieving them all at once.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- P
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Spin versionRun 'spin --version' or check the version of the spin package in your deployment (container image tag, Helm chart version, or binary version)Affected if Version is below 3.6.1 for standalone Spin, below 0.6.2 for SpinKube, or below 0.22.1 for containerd-shim-spin
-
Check if Spin connects to external databasesReview Spin application manifests (spin.toml) and runtime configuration for any 'sqlite' or database connection definitions that fetch unbounded query resultsAffected if Spin is configured to query databases without external response size limits enforced by the database itself
-
Check if Spin makes outbound HTTP requestsReview spin.toml for HTTP outgoing handlers or examine network policies that allow Spin to connect to arbitrary HTTP endpointsAffected if Spin guest applications can make HTTP requests to untrusted or uncontrolled external servers returning large responses
-
Monitor for memory exhaustion symptomsCheck Spin host logs, system dmesg, or container runtime logs for out-of-memory errors, panics, or crashes that coincide with database queries or HTTP responsesAffected if Memory exhaustion or process crashes occur after handling large database result sets or HTTP response bodies
-
Verify workload isolation boundariesConfirm whether multiple guest WebAssembly modules share the same Spin host process and can trigger large allocations on each other's behalfAffected if Untrusted guest Wasm modules can cause memory pressure affecting the entire Spin host
You are affected if running a Spin version below 3.6.1 (or SpinKube below 0.6.2, or containerd-shim-spin below 0.22.1) AND your Spin applications connect to external databases or HTTP servers that can return arbitrarily large responses.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Spin 3.6.1, SpinKube 0.6.2, or containerd-shim-spin 0.22.1. As a workaround or additional hardening, configure Spin to only connect to trusted databases and HTTP servers that enforce response size limits.
Spin 3.6.1, SpinKube 0.6.2, containerd-shim-spin 0.22.1 (or later)
- Upgrade Spin to version 3.6.1 or later
- Upgrade SpinKube to version 0.6.2 or later
- Upgrade containerd-shim-spin to version 0.22.1 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-27887 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-27887 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data