CVE-2026-27911
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedConcurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows User Interface Core allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a race condition vulnerability in Windows User Interface Core where improper synchronization of shared resources allows a locally authorized attacker to elevate privileges. The vulnerability stems from concurrent access to shared state without adequate locking mechanisms, enabling an attacker to manipulate timing to achieve privilege escalation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.14393.9060< 10.0.17763.8644< 10.0.19044.7184< 10.0.19045.7184< 10.0.22631.6936< 10.0.26100.8246< 10.0.26200.8246< 10.0.28000.1836CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows version and build numberRun 'winver' from command prompt or check System Properties, or run 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to retrieve the exact version and build numberAffected if The displayed version falls within any of the affected ranges and is lower than the fixed build numbers (14393.9060, 17763.8644, 19044.7184, 19045.7184, 22631.6936, 26100.8246, 26200.8246, 28000.1836)
-
Verify Windows editionRun 'winver' or check System Properties to confirm if the system is Windows 10 or Windows 11, as the vulnerability affects specific Windows 10 and Windows 11 versions onlyAffected if The system is running Windows 10 version 1607, 1809, 21h2, 22h2 or Windows 11 versions 23h2, 24h2, 25h2, 26h1 with a build number below the fixed threshold
-
Confirm UI Core component presenceCheck that the Windows User Interface Core components are present on the system - these are core Windows GUI components typically found in %SystemRoot%\System32\ui*.dll filesAffected if The UI Core components exist on the system (vulnerability resides in these components)
-
Check for pending security updatesOpen Windows Update settings and check 'Update history' for installed security updates, or run 'wmic qfe list' to see installed hotfixesAffected if No security update for CVE-2026-27911 has been installed, indicating the vulnerability remains unpatched
A system is affected if it runs any of the listed Windows 10 or 11 versions with a build number lower than the fixed threshold and has not received the corresponding security update for CVE-2026-27911.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.906010.0.17763.864410.0.19044.7184
Apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-27911 once released. As a defensive measure, monitor for suspicious processes attempting to interact with UI Core components and restrict local administrative privileges where possible.
Upgrade to the respective fixed build: Windows 10 1607 to 10.0.14393.9060 | Windows 10 1809 to 10.0.17763.8644 | Windows 10 21h2 to 10.0.19044.7184 | Windows 10 22h2 to 10.0.19045.7184 | Windows 11 23h2 to 10.0.22631.6936 | Windows 11 24h2 to 10.0.26100.8246 | Windows 11 25h2 to 10.0.26200.8246 | Wi
- Identify the current Windows build version by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /C:"Build"' in Command Prompt
- Open Settings > Windows Update and check for updates, or manually download the appropriate cumulative update from the Microsoft Update Catalog for your Windows version
- Install theKB update that addresses CVE-2026-27911 (refer to Microsoft Security Response Center for the specificKB number)
- Restart the system to apply the update
- Verify the installation by checking that the build number matches or exceeds the fixed version for your Windows release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-27911 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-27911 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data