Code InjectionWeakness · CWE-94

CVE-2026-27984

CRITICAL · 9.0 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-03-05
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Marketing Fire Widget Options widget-options allows Code Injection.This issue affects Widget Options: from n/a through <= 4.1.3.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A code injection vulnerability exists in the Widget Options plugin (versions up to 4.1.3) that allows attackers to inject malicious code through the plugin's widget-options functionality. The vulnerability stems from improper control of code generation, likely due to insufficient input validation or unsafe use of user-supplied data in code execution contexts.

MitigationUpdate Widget Options plugin to the latest version immediately; if no patch is available, disable the plugin until a fix is released. Implement Web Application Firewall rules to block injection attempts targeting the affected endpoint.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Widget Options plugin is installed
    Locate the plugin directory in your WordPress installation (typically wp-content/plugins/widget-options) and verify the plugin files exist. In WordPress admin, check Plugins > Installed Plugins for 'Widget Options'.
    Affected if The plugin is present on the system.
  2. Determine the installed version
    Read the main plugin file (usually widget-options.php) and locate the version defined in the plugin header comment (e.g., 'Version: x.x.x'). Compare this version to the affected range of 4.1.3 and below.
    Affected if The installed version is 4.1.3 or any earlier version.
  3. Verify widget-options functionality is in use
    Check your WordPress widgets configuration (Appearance > Widgets) to see if any widgets have custom 'Widget Options' applied. Also review active theme functions.php for calls to widget_options related functions.
    Affected if The widget-options feature is actively configured or the plugin is loaded on the site.
  4. Review access logs for injection attempts
    Inspect web server access logs (Apache/nginx) for POST or GET requests to endpoints containing 'widget-options', 'option_tree', or suspicious patterns with code execution keywords (eval, base64_decode, system, exec).
    Affected if Malicious requests targeting the vulnerable parameter are found in logs.
  5. Check for unauthorized code modifications
    Compare the plugin files (especially widget-options.php and any files handling the options/settings) against a clean installation from the WordPress repository. Look for base64_decode calls, eval statements, or file creation functions using user input.
    Affected if Unexpected code execution functions or suspicious modifications exist in plugin files.

You are affected if the Widget Options plugin is installed with version 4.1.3 or lower and the widget-options feature is active or exposed via web requests.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update Widget Options plugin to the latest version immediately; if no patch is available, disable the plugin until a fix is released. Implement Web Application Firewall rules to block injection attempts targeting the affected endpoint.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-27984 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-27984 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data